| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Double KEYWORDS lines break tools like ekeyword and Nattka.
As per PMS, blank/empty KEYWORDS is implied by not defining
the variable.
See: https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/ebuild-format.html#pg0105
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both the latest release and the live ebuild.
Doesn't do any Lua detection by itself, relies on libsc configuration
instead. Therefore, the same compatibility as respective libsc versions.
Status:
- 2.2-r100 builds, tests and installs fine
- 9999 untested due to build failures in sci-libs/libsc-9999
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/752846
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only ebuilds which previously were happy with any slot (those which
explicitly specify one of the 5.x slots are allowed to keep doing so
until they have been migrated to the eclasses) and which do not require
a version of Lua higher than 5.1 (to prevent CI from complaining about
non-existent dependencies; all of these should have been masked or
USE-masked by now anyway).
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/680140
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Matthias Maier <tamiko@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.6, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|