From 56bd759df1d0c750a065b8c845e93d5dfa6b549d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Robin H. Johnson" Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 13:49:04 -0700 Subject: proj/gentoo: Initial commit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This commit represents a new era for Gentoo: Storing the gentoo-x86 tree in Git, as converted from CVS. This commit is the start of the NEW history. Any historical data is intended to be grafted onto this point. Creation process: 1. Take final CVS checkout snapshot 2. Remove ALL ChangeLog* files 3. Transform all Manifests to thin 4. Remove empty Manifests 5. Convert all stale $Header$/$Id$ CVS keywords to non-expanded Git $Id$ 5.1. Do not touch files with -kb/-ko keyword flags. Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson X-Thanks: Alec Warner - did the GSoC 2006 migration tests X-Thanks: Robin H. Johnson - infra guy, herding this project X-Thanks: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy - Former Gentoo developer, wrote Git features for the migration X-Thanks: Brian Harring - wrote much python to improve cvs2svn X-Thanks: Rich Freeman - validation scripts X-Thanks: Patrick Lauer - Gentoo dev, running new 2014 work in migration X-Thanks: Michał Górny - scripts, QA, nagging X-Thanks: All of other Gentoo developers - many ideas and lots of paint on the bikeshed --- .../axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch (limited to 'dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch') diff --git a/dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch b/dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9df20a5cd82d --- /dev/null +++ b/dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +--- test/lib/axiom/test/test_query.py.orig 2015-07-21 10:15:57.441000000 +0000 ++++ test/lib/axiom/test/test_query.py 2015-07-21 10:16:36.356000000 +0000 +@@ -1043,46 +1043,46 @@ + SecondType(store=self.store) + + +- def test_firstTableOuterLoop(self): +- """ +- Test that in a two table query, the table which appears first in the +- result of the getInvolvedTables method of the comparison used is the +- one which the outer join loop iterates over. +- +- Test this by inserting rows into the first table and checking that the +- number of bytecodes executed increased. +- """ +- counter = QueryCounter(self.store) +- counts = [] +- for c in range(10): +- counts.append(counter.measure(list, self.query)) +- FirstType(store=self.store) +- +- # Make sure they're not all the same +- self.assertEqual(len(set(counts)), len(counts)) +- +- # Make sure they're increasing +- self.assertEqual(counts, sorted(counts)) +- +- +- def test_secondTableInnerLoop(self): +- """ +- Like L{test_firstTableOuterLoop} but for the second table being +- iterated over by the inner loop. +- +- This creates more rows in the second table while still performing a +- query for which no rows in the first table satisfy the WHERE +- condition. This should mean that rows from the second table are +- never examined. +- """ +- counter = QueryCounter(self.store) +- count = None +- for i in range(10): +- c = counter.measure(list, self.query) +- if count is None: +- count = c +- self.assertEqual(count, c) +- SecondType(store=self.store) ++ #def test_firstTableOuterLoop(self): ++ # """ ++ # Test that in a two table query, the table which appears first in the ++ # result of the getInvolvedTables method of the comparison used is the ++ # one which the outer join loop iterates over. ++ ++ # Test this by inserting rows into the first table and checking that the ++ # number of bytecodes executed increased. ++ # """ ++ # counter = QueryCounter(self.store) ++ # counts = [] ++ # for c in range(10): ++ # counts.append(counter.measure(list, self.query)) ++ # FirstType(store=self.store) ++ ++ # # Make sure they're not all the same ++ # self.assertEqual(len(set(counts)), len(counts)) ++ ++ # # Make sure they're increasing ++ # self.assertEqual(counts, sorted(counts)) ++ ++ ++ #def test_secondTableInnerLoop(self): ++ # """ ++ # Like L{test_firstTableOuterLoop} but for the second table being ++ # iterated over by the inner loop. ++ ++ # This creates more rows in the second table while still performing a ++ # query for which no rows in the first table satisfy the WHERE ++ # condition. This should mean that rows from the second table are ++ # never examined. ++ # """ ++ # counter = QueryCounter(self.store) ++ # count = None ++ # for i in range(10): ++ # c = counter.measure(list, self.query) ++ # if count is None: ++ # count = c ++ # self.assertEqual(count, c) ++ # SecondType(store=self.store) + + + class AndOrQueries(QueryingTestCase): -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258