2 files changed, 0 insertions, 65 deletions
diff --git a/dev-ruby/rspec-mocks/files/rspec-mocks-3.7.0-ruby25-1.patch b/dev-ruby/rspec-mocks/files/rspec-mocks-3.7.0-ruby25-1.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 6b545ae3cf7a..000000000000
--- a/dev-ruby/rspec-mocks/files/rspec-mocks-3.7.0-ruby25-1.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-From 871eb31e3bfe50705ca57e754771aa1e0164f12d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Myron Marston <myron.marston@gmail.com>
-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 17:45:43 -0800
-Subject: [PATCH] Skip spec that does not apply to Ruby 2.5.
-
-Ruby 2.5 has removed the ability to access top-level constants
-via a confusing nested form (e.g. `MyClass::Hash`), so we no
-longer need this spec there.
-
-For #1192.
----
- spec/rspec/mocks/mutate_const_spec.rb | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/mutate_const_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/mutate_const_spec.rb
-index fe8d4128..9d80dd73 100644
---- a/spec/rspec/mocks/mutate_const_spec.rb
-+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/mutate_const_spec.rb
-@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ def change_const_value_to(value)
-             expect(::Hash).to equal(top_level_hash)
-           end
- 
--          it 'does not affect the ability to access the top-level constant from nested contexts', :silence_warnings do
-+          it 'does not affect the ability to access the top-level constant from nested contexts', :silence_warnings, :if => RUBY_VERSION < '2.5' do
-             top_level_hash = ::Hash
- 
-             hide_const("TestClass::Hash")
diff --git a/dev-ruby/rspec-mocks/files/rspec-mocks-3.7.0-ruby25-2.patch b/dev-ruby/rspec-mocks/files/rspec-mocks-3.7.0-ruby25-2.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 3ac448938416..000000000000
--- a/dev-ruby/rspec-mocks/files/rspec-mocks-3.7.0-ruby25-2.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-From 783923d6879a2f9df9fee8ef24cecca6ac21136e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Myron Marston <myron.marston@gmail.com>
-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 23:35:27 -0800
-Subject: [PATCH] Make spec less brittle.
-
-On Ruby 2.5, this spec failed, apparently due to the fact that
-Method equality has changed on 2.5 slightly. The method instances
-have always been different but 2.4 and before considered them
-equivalent. Instead, we can show that the two method objects
-_behave_ the same, which is what we really care about.
-
-Fixes #1192.
----
- spec/rspec/mocks/and_wrap_original_spec.rb | 9 +++++----
- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/and_wrap_original_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/and_wrap_original_spec.rb
-index df9cae46..2d4d0a8b 100644
---- a/spec/rspec/mocks/and_wrap_original_spec.rb
-+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/and_wrap_original_spec.rb
-@@ -26,12 +26,13 @@ def results
-         }.to raise_error NameError
-       end
- 
--      it "passes in the original method" do
--        value = nil
-+      it "passes along the original method" do
-+        passed_method = nil
-         original_method = instance.method(:results)
--        allow_it.to receive(:results).and_wrap_original { |m| value = m }
-+        allow_it.to receive(:results).and_wrap_original { |m| passed_method = m }
-         instance.results
--        expect(value).to eq original_method
-+
-+        expect(passed_method.call).to eq(original_method.call)
-       end
- 
-       it "passes along the message arguments" do