summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>2017-02-26 22:56:01 +0100
committerAndreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>2017-02-26 22:56:01 +0100
commit6388b11ef843cb020d02f47e0b1e982b9fef1e0c (patch)
tree993971523e5cb6a9a7b0fcd36cd66f702448271b /decisions
parentAdd 2014/1 and 2014/2 to the index (diff)
downloadcouncil-6388b11ef843cb020d02f47e0b1e982b9fef1e0c.tar.gz
council-6388b11ef843cb020d02f47e0b1e982b9fef1e0c.tar.bz2
council-6388b11ef843cb020d02f47e0b1e982b9fef1e0c.zip
Add 3/2014 and 4/2014 to index
Diffstat (limited to 'decisions')
-rw-r--r--decisions/decisions.but2
-rw-r--r--decisions/decisions.mlf18
-rw-r--r--decisions/decisions.mls18
-rw-r--r--decisions/decisions.tex2
-rw-r--r--decisions/summary-20140311.tex89
-rw-r--r--decisions/summary-20140408.tex117
6 files changed, 246 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/decisions.but b/decisions/decisions.but
index f9a15ea..f9e6630 100644
--- a/decisions/decisions.but
+++ b/decisions/decisions.but
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
[Future EAPI] add support for dynamic SLOTS
282296
[Future EAPI] Allow directories for use.* and package.* entries in profiles
+477030
+Missing summary for 20130611 council meeting
498332
Dropping stable keywords on m68k, s390, sh
503382
diff --git a/decisions/decisions.mlf b/decisions/decisions.mlf
index 3fc4c34..f97750d 100644
--- a/decisions/decisions.mlf
+++ b/decisions/decisions.mlf
@@ -4,18 +4,28 @@ Andrew Savchenko
Michał Górny
14cc0e4a82ac3fe0a6aca94aaebb981f:gentoo-project
Ulrich Mueller
+1c2224a5a468ff854e73fc60d25f7dce:gentoo-project
+Michał Górny
1ccf2b07b96f4b164e6f69fb5d2d6cc7:gentoo-project
Raymond Jennings
+3a319600f3dc2dc42703a710155b2882:gentoo-project
+Ulrich Mueller
3ebf4ccf0d4f27d6240888a3100d0d58:gentoo-project
Dirkjan Ochtman
402eb403e0f451e7bc0525b76e9d3da2:gentoo-project
Ulrich Mueller
41e09d1ddc8b30abb9f9d21d205b7b82:gentoo-dev
Michał Górny
+44defe3ffe0fc93ad754bd895ed0196c:gentoo-project
+Chris Reffett
+474fc6822dba50ccc6192c9f31d8024a:gentoo-project
+Patrick Lauer
4a88db38253494c6612a29117b2b19c8:gentoo-project
Matthew Thode
50dbe189dd2641d5730f08944e7fa7ce:gentoo-project
Anthony G. Basile
+6041b91cfa4c52c427ddbbd4f69607ff:gentoo-project
+Rich Freeman
60481da5b44b778ca5c4405da28f61c7:gentoo-project
Michał Górny
637270936c9f07e3bd2f10ee45264a42:gentoo-project
@@ -30,10 +40,16 @@ Ulrich Mueller
Michał Górny
70b28773ada15c2f4d1bcf1428ffa6a9:gentoo-project
Kristian Fiskerstrand
+71c67cdf620f262b4f94765360c8c8c2:gentoo-project
+Tom Wijsman
87e630b9da724c5c59060608aba596a9:gentoo-dev
Kristian Fiskerstrand
+8fb1d8c0dd80e17cbb1fc633006f14b9:gentoo-project
+Patrick Lauer
9578d459aee22ca47b1dc19149684662:gentoo-project
Ulrich Mueller
+9bc36a643a969e165c6f7cf228f2745c:gentoo-project
+Andreas K. Huettel
a08ea09c2c8e534fd9bc1146703c66ff:gentoo-dev
Michał Górny
a0a53d00109512557d233997699e8ce1:gentoo-project
@@ -42,6 +58,8 @@ a292e9567fac838681899b50dff24cce:gentoo-project
Michał Górny
b2e8c759b08c29f2c4215ea74511bf1c:gentoo-project
Ulrich Mueller
+b59d8abb15e148b71d6e50180a2a27a7:gentoo-project
+Patrick Lauer
b9460b9c8d578c3498c217c17b75afd4:gentoo-dev
Ulrich Mueller
bc0a1b7498c389bdbb0b0d52feb43391:gentoo-project
diff --git a/decisions/decisions.mls b/decisions/decisions.mls
index 7bc21f8..9e63b40 100644
--- a/decisions/decisions.mls
+++ b/decisions/decisions.mls
@@ -4,18 +4,28 @@ Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2016-02-14
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2017-02-12
14cc0e4a82ac3fe0a6aca94aaebb981f:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25
+1c2224a5a468ff854e73fc60d25f7dce:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08
1ccf2b07b96f4b164e6f69fb5d2d6cc7:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-11-13
+3a319600f3dc2dc42703a710155b2882:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11
3ebf4ccf0d4f27d6240888a3100d0d58:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2016-02-14
402eb403e0f451e7bc0525b76e9d3da2:gentoo-project
[gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-04-10
41e09d1ddc8b30abb9f9d21d205b7b82:gentoo-dev
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems
+44defe3ffe0fc93ad754bd895ed0196c:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08
+474fc6822dba50ccc6192c9f31d8024a:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11
4a88db38253494c6612a29117b2b19c8:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-11-13
50dbe189dd2641d5730f08944e7fa7ce:gentoo-project
[gentoo-project] Gentoo Council: agenda for June 12 meeting
+6041b91cfa4c52c427ddbbd4f69607ff:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08
60481da5b44b778ca5c4405da28f61c7:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-11-13
637270936c9f07e3bd2f10ee45264a42:gentoo-project
@@ -30,10 +40,16 @@ Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Python ABIFLAGS rebuild needed
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2016-02-14
70b28773ada15c2f4d1bcf1428ffa6a9:gentoo-project
Ongoing stabilization discussion (Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2016-11-13)
+71c67cdf620f262b4f94765360c8c8c2:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08
87e630b9da724c5c59060608aba596a9:gentoo-dev
[gentoo-dev] RFC: Eclasses and EAPI
+8fb1d8c0dd80e17cbb1fc633006f14b9:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11
9578d459aee22ca47b1dc19149684662:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-12-13
+9bc36a643a969e165c6f7cf228f2745c:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08
a08ea09c2c8e534fd9bc1146703c66ff:gentoo-dev
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?
a0a53d00109512557d233997699e8ce1:gentoo-project
@@ -42,6 +58,8 @@ a292e9567fac838681899b50dff24cce:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-04-10
b2e8c759b08c29f2c4215ea74511bf1c:gentoo-project
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25
+b59d8abb15e148b71d6e50180a2a27a7:gentoo-project
+Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11
b9460b9c8d578c3498c217c17b75afd4:gentoo-dev
[gentoo-dev] RFD: News item format 2.0
bc0a1b7498c389bdbb0b0d52feb43391:gentoo-project
diff --git a/decisions/decisions.tex b/decisions/decisions.tex
index d9d13e5..35861d4 100644
--- a/decisions/decisions.tex
+++ b/decisions/decisions.tex
@@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ pdfauthor={Andreas K. Huettel}
\include{summary-20140114}
\include{summary-20140225}
+\include{summary-20140311}
+\include{summary-20140408}
\chapter{Meeting summaries 2015/16}
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20140311.tex b/decisions/summary-20140311.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..38fce80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20140311.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+
+\summary{2014}{3}{11}
+
+\agendaitem{Vote on GLEP 63}
+
+Previous council action approved in principle the policies outlined in
+"\glep{63}: Gentoo GPG key policies", but delayed the vote for approval
+until the final language was put in place. dilfridge presented a shorter
+version of the GLEP which removed the "howto" language and reduced it to
+just policy (\wgoref{User:Dilfridge/GLEP:1001a}). Discussion progressed to a
+consensus that we should have only policy in the GLEP and a practical guide
+should be a separate document which can be changed without council vote.
+
+We tabled the vote until either an email vote (initiated by dilfridge) or
+the next meeting.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Ban on EAPI 1 and 2 should extend to updating EAPI in existing
+ebuilds}
+\index{EAPI!1}\index{EAPI!2}
+
+Reference: \agoref{gentoo-project}{3a319600f3dc2dc42703a710155b2882}
+
+The council considered the question of whether the ban on EAPIs 1 and 2 should
+extended to updating EAPIs in *existing* ebuilds, and not just new ebuilds added
+to the tree. mgorny noted that we need bumps from EAPI 0 to 1 because we need
+an easy way to introduce slotting without the major rewriting of ebuild phases
+than an EAPI 0 to 3 bump would require. After discussion, the council voted on
+the following motion:
+
+\vote{EAPI 1 and 2 are now banned. This ban should not only be limited to new
+ebuilds, but should be extended to include updating EAPIs in *existing* ebuilds.
+In case of non-maintainer commits to fix dependencies, EAPI=0 ebuilds may be
+updated to EAPI=1 to keep the changes at a non-intrusive level, as a temporary
+workaround.}{Carried with 4 yes, 1 no and 1 abstention.}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Make all cosmetic repoman warnings fatal}
+\index{repoman}
+
+Reference: \agoref{gentoo-project}{8fb1d8c0dd80e17cbb1fc633006f14b9}
+
+The council considered the question of whether all repoman warnings should be
+made fatal. Consensus was reached that this would lead to too many false
+positives.
+
+The motion failed with 4 no and 1 abstention.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Adherence to FHS standards in Gentoo: putting config files int /etc}
+\index{FHS}\index{udev rules}\index{configuration files!location}
+
+References:
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item \agoref{gentoo-project}{474fc6822dba50ccc6192c9f31d8024a}
+ \item \agoref{gentoo-project}{b59d8abb15e148b71d6e50180a2a27a7}
+ \item \url{http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/filesystem/index.html}
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+The question of where config files should go was raised by patrick. The
+council discussed whether it should be policy to put all config files in /etc.
+However, what defines a config file is unclear because some packages, like udev or
+eudev, put their *default* config files in /lib/udev/rules.d which are overridden
+by the files in /etc/udev/rules.d. The former are not meant to be user-edited while
+the later are. The council is okay with static config files living outside of /etc
+while user-editable config files should be in /etc.
+
+rich0 introduced the following motion:
+
+\vote{Council does not feel additional policy required regarding config files
+in /etc.
+In particular packages that place config templates in /usr or /lib* and allow overriding
+in /etc are fine. Specific issues not already discussed can be raised in future
+meetings.}{Passed with 4 yes and 1 abstention.}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Bugs with council involvement}
+
+The council looked at two open bugs:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item \bug{503382}: dberkholz said he would upload those summaries soon.
+\item \bug{477030}: There has been no progress. scarabeus was to nudge
+betelgeuse for that summary.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\agendaitem{Open floor}
+
+No issues were brought forward.
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20140408.tex b/decisions/summary-20140408.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c3de03b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20140408.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+
+\summary{2014}{4}{8}
+
+\agendaitem{Vote on GLEP 63}
+
+Council action last meeting tabled the vote on "\glep{63}: Gentoo GPG key
+policies" because dilfridge, one of the authors, presented a shorter version
+which removed the "howto" language and reduced it to just policy
+(\wgoref{User:Dilfridge/GLEP:1001a}). The council has now had time to consider
+this version and the general feeling was that the GLEP should concentrate only
+on policy and move any questions of implementation to another document.
+
+The council unanimously approved the shorter version.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Use of ISO/IEC prefixes vs base-10}
+\index{ISO prefixes}
+
+References:
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item
+ \agoref{gentoo-project}{1c2224a5a468ff854e73fc60d25f7dce}
+ \item
+ \agoref{gentoo-project}{6041b91cfa4c52c427ddbbd4f69607ff}
+\end{itemize}
+
+The council considered whether a) ISO/IEC prefixes, Ki=$2^{10}$, etc., should be
+preferred over ISO base-10 prefixes, k=$10^3$, etc., or b) we should just
+require unambiguous units in check-reqs.eclass, where KiB etc are base-2 and k
+etc are base-10. Two proposal were brought forward by rich0. Proposal
+2 was adopted:
+
+\begin{quote}{\it
+Whenever practical developers are required to use unit prefixes defined in
+IEC 80000-13 (kB, KiB, etc) so that output is unambiguous. This does not
+require maintainers to patch upstream code to change its behavior, but they
+should be applied with code that originates in Gentoo.}
+\end{quote}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Recent events regarding new virtuals, masking by QA and then
+unmasking}
+\index{project!QA}\index{mailing lists}
+
+References:
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item \agoref{gentoo-project}{71c67cdf620f262b4f94765360c8c8c2}
+ \item http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/90800 (broken link)
+ \item \agoref{gentoo-project}{9bc36a643a969e165c6f7cf228f2745c}
+ \item \agoref{gentoo-project}{44defe3ffe0fc93ad754bd895ed0196c}
+\end{itemize}
+
+The council consider what action to take with regards to the controversy around
+the recent introduction of virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev. Roughly the
+time sequence of events was as follows:
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item the eudev team was excluded from discussions about the virtuals
+\item the virtuals were committed, leading to breakage for eudev
+\item the virtuals were masked by a member of the QA team
+\item the virtuals were unmasked by their maintainer without authorization
+from QA.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+This led to two long discussion threads on gentoo-project@g.o and
+gentoo-dev@g.o. dilfridge suggested the council take a position on five
+points which address the systematic problems in the Gentoo community that led to
+the above events. The council approved sending an email to the community
+based on the following 4 of the 5 points:
+
+{\it \begin{enumerate}
+\item The council encourages teams maintaining central parts of Gentoo to
+accept new developers as team members and teach them the required knowledge and
+intricacies. We consider this important to ensure long-term continuity and
+increase the bus factor in critical areas.
+\item While it is any developer's choice not to participate on the gentoo-dev
+and
+gentoo-project mailing lists, they nevertheless serve as main communication
+channels. If something has been discussed there, and then action has been taken,
+the council regards ignorance of the discussion not as a good foundation for
+protests against the actions.
+\item
+The council believes that a wide announcement and if needed discussion of
+changes to central parts of Gentoo (as, e.g., system packages, profiles) should
+be preferred. In particular, only informing "relevant people" makes no sense if
+others will also be affected.
+\item
+The council strongly disapproves of any developers unilaterally reverting QA
+team actions. While any future case decisions lie with QA and ComRel teams, the
+council welcomes the idea of immediate sanctions in such a case. An individual
+developer who disagrees with an action made in the name of QA, whether the
+action is proper or not, MUST follow the escalation procedures set forth in GLEP
+48, and is encouraged to work with QA, or eventually ComRel or the council to
+settle any concerns. The council will follow up on any accusations of QA abuse
+the same way as on any commit that is in conflict with a QA action.
+\end{enumerate}}
+
+One point urging QA to adopt policies regarding internal disagreements was
+dropped since QA is in fact looking into the matter now.
+
+
+
+\agendaitem{Bugs with council involvement}
+
+The council looked at two open bugs:
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item
+\bug{503382}: dberkholz said he would upload those summaries soon.
+ \item
+\bug{477030}: Still no progress here. scarabeus said he would try to bug
+Betelgeuse again.
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open floor}
+
+No issues were brought forward.
+