Index 2015/8 and 2015/9

3 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/decisions/decisions.tex b/decisions/decisions.tex
index 5fe5d1d..bf9778e 100644
--- a/decisions/decisions.tex
+++ b/decisions/decisions.tex
@@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ All summaries have been added here.
 Council members: blueness, dilfridge, jlec, k_f, rich0, ulm, williamh
 
 \include{summary-20150727}
+\include{summary-20150809}
+\include{summary-20150913}
 
 \include{summary-20151108}
 \include{summary-20151213}
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20150809.tex b/decisions/summary-20150809.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b17cfa7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20150809.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+
+\summary{2015}{8}{9}
+
+
+\agendaitem{the state of Java}
+\index{java}\index{project!java}
+
+The council acknowledged that we have issues with manpower, and rich0
+agreed to send out a message encouraging projects to recruit more and
+calling for more interest in the events/pr projects.
+
+k_f also stated he would write an acknowledgement of the git migration
+to send out.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open Bugs with Council Involvement}
+
+\bug{503382}: blueness and ulm agreed to complete this bug.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open Floor}
+
+Williamh brought up questions about the git commit conventions; it was
+determined that the best place to discuss this was the mailing list.
+
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20150913.tex b/decisions/summary-20150913.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b7bcc6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20150913.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+
+\summary{2015}{9}{13}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Use flag policies}
+\index{use flag!gtk}
+
+References:
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item 
+ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/4775 (dead link)
+ \item
+ \url{https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Toolkit_USE_Flags\&oldid=362768}
+\end{itemize}
+
+On the topic of how to structure toolkit use flags, a lengthy 
+discussion with opposing viewpoints resulted. Consensus was that 
+manual intervention needed by REQUIRED_USE should be kept to a minimum, 
+and that users should not need to perform per-package useflag 
+micromanagement. 
+
+For approaching the problem systematically it was felt that we need 
+more information on the current in-tree use cases of the flags and 
+the objectives that we're actually trying to achieve by setting a policy. 
+dilfridge volunteered to collect use cases for toolkit use flags, 
+rich0 to formulate the objectives. Future discussion will focus on the
+suitability of the different approaches.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Projects without a lead, lead elections}
+\index{projects!without lead}\index{project lead!elections}
+
+The wording of \glep{39} was found to be unclear if not confusing (it
+states that a project "may have one or many leads", and that their
+selection "must occur at least once every 12 months").
+
+After discussion the following points were agreed upon:
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item 
+The Gentoo Wiki project page template should be enhanced to show the
+  last lead election date for each project.
+\item
+The council sends an e-mail to the gentoo-project mailing list asking 
+  projects to consider electing a lead and confirming her/him regularly.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\agendaitem{Bugs with council involvment}
+
+\bug{503382}: Ulm started working on the 20131210 summary. No news otherwise.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open floor}
+
+No topics were brought up.