Add missing summary for 20140225 meeting, bug 503382.

1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meeting-logs/20140225-summary.txt b/meeting-logs/20140225-summary.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c53d71d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-logs/20140225-summary.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Summary of Gentoo council meeting 25 February 2014
+
+Agenda
+======
+1. Roll call
+2. Open bugs/issues [1]
+3. EAPI deprecation [2,3]
+4. Stable keywords on testing architectures [4,5,6]
+5. gtk USE flags [3,7,8,9,10]
+6. Open floor
+
+Roll call
+=========
+Present:
+blueness, dberkholz, dilfridge, rich0, scarabeus, ulm, williamh
+
+Open bugs/issues
+================
+- GLEP 63 (GPG signing).
+  This is now a draft and has a number assigned [1]. However, a vote
+  hasn't been requested yet, and there are still some pending changes.
+  Therefore postponed to next meeting.
+
+EAPI deprecation
+================
+The council voted to deprecate or ban EAPIs 0 to 3:
+- Deprecate EAPI 3: Accepted unanimously.
+- Deprecate EAPI 0: Accepted unanimously.
+- Ban new EAPI 1 ebuilds: Accepted unanimously.
+- Ban new EAPI 2 ebuilds: Accepted (5 yes, 1 no, 1 abstention).
+
+Stable keywords on testing architectures
+========================================
+Some developers continued to mark ebuilds stable on archs dropped to
+testing (namely, m68k, sh, and s390), leaving dependencies on these
+archs in an inconsistent state. The council notes that this will not
+be a problem if these archs are marked as "exp" in profiles.desc.
+The respective arch team can use repoman -e, whereas other developers
+can ignore stable keywords for these archs. In particular, dropping
+the last stable version of an ebuild for an "exp" arch is allowed.
+
+- Vote: Minor archs with inconsistent stable keywording should be
+  marked "exp".
+  Accepted unanimously.
+
+gtk USE flags
+=============
+Following the recent announcement of the QA team on USE flag policy,
+especially gtk flags, the council discussed whether QA has such
+authority over tree policy.
+
+- Vote: QA's right to create standards in GLEP 48 includes flag
+  names and functionalities.
+  Accepted (5 yes, 2 abstentions).
+
+The council did not vote on the concrete issue of gtk flags. It was
+suggested that the QA and GNOME teams should discuss any further
+issues arising there.
+
+Open floor
+==========
+TomWij asked whether consistent category naming or bigger categories
+should be preferred, which was briefly discussed.
+
+
+[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:63
+[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/3303
+[3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/90291
+[4] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/3311
+[5] https://bugs.gentoo.org/498332#c5
+[6] https://bugs.gentoo.org/498332#c11
+[7] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/3321
+[8] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:48
+[9] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/3319
+[10] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=111212920310822&w=2