diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | meeting-logs/20170409.txt | 89 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | meeting-logs/20170409.txt.asc | 16 |
2 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20170409.txt b/meeting-logs/20170409.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..300ae25 --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-logs/20170409.txt @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +14:01 <@WilliamH> agenda is here: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/716e138cd834ab29e1f74bcc2e35eb41 +14:01 <@WilliamH> roll call +14:01 * WilliamH here +14:01 * K_F here +14:01 * kent\n here for dilfridge +14:01 * ulm here +14:01 * rich0 here +14:02 <@WilliamH> Soap__: ping? +14:03 <@WilliamH> The only topic we have is open bugs with council involvement... +14:04 <@WilliamH> bug 571490 +14:04 < willikins> WilliamH: https://bugs.gentoo.org/571490 "Missing summary for 20151025 council meeting"; Documentation, Project-specific documentation; CONF; mgorny:council +14:04 <@K_F> lets give it some minutes to see if blueness and soap doesn't show up +14:04 <@K_F> anyone can SMS blueness? +14:05 <@ulm> yeah, I have his number +14:05 <@ulm> I've texted him +14:05 <@K_F> ulm: thanks +14:09 <@K_F> hmm, guess they won't show up then.. +14:09 <@WilliamH> moving on... +14:10 <@WilliamH> bug 571490 +14:10 < willikins> WilliamH: https://bugs.gentoo.org/571490 "Missing summary for 20151025 council meeting"; Documentation, Project-specific documentation; CONF; mgorny:council +14:10 <@K_F> summary is in git repo, I can update wiki, then that is closed +14:10 <@WilliamH> K_F: ok, cool. +14:10 <@WilliamH> bug 565566 +14:11 < willikins> WilliamH: https://bugs.gentoo.org/565566 "New ChangeLogs are in chronological order"; Gentoo Infrastructure, CVS/SVN/Git; CONF; patrick:infra-bugs +14:11 <@WilliamH> still nothing from infra +14:11 <@K_F> I'm keeping same sentiment as last meeting on it +14:12 <@K_F> if anyone feel strongly for it they can follow up, but it is not really much for council to do (decisions etc) at this point +14:12 <@WilliamH> bug 610990 +14:12 < willikins> WilliamH: https://bugs.gentoo.org/610990 "Please create a BZ product "Gentoo Council" similar to "Gentoo Foundation""; Gentoo Infrastructure, Bugzilla; CONF; dilfridge:bugzilla +14:13 <@WilliamH> before 990. +14:13 <@WilliamH> should we remove council from the cc on 566 since there's nothing we can do? +14:14 <@ulm> I think that we should keep watching it +14:14 <@WilliamH> ok, no problem. +14:14 <@WilliamH> then for bug 610990 +14:14 < willikins> WilliamH: https://bugs.gentoo.org/610990 "Please create a BZ product "Gentoo Council" similar to "Gentoo Foundation""; Gentoo Infrastructure, Bugzilla; CONF; dilfridge:bugzilla +14:15 <@WilliamH> Any comments on this one? +14:15 < kent\n> side thought, an "Administration" product could contain Council and Foundation. *shrug* +14:16 <@K_F> mgorny already propose something of the sort +14:16 <@rich0> You could lump in comrel and a bunch of other stuff in there. +14:17 <@rich0> Including infra, actually. +14:17 < kent\n> Infra seems better descriptor of "physical admininistration" where as this is more "Social Administration" +14:18 <@rich0> Seems related to me. Comrel and recruiters would fall into the social bucket. +14:18 <@K_F> to me it comes down to the point on access restriction and group permissions +14:18 <@rich0> But, sure, there is a gray area. +14:18 <@K_F> mgorny wasn't sure if that can be done on component level or if it needs to be on product level, if it can't that is moot discussion +14:18 <@K_F> so before that can be discussed at all needs to get confirmation it is possible +14:19 * WilliamH agrees with k_f +14:19 * kent\n ack +14:19 <@K_F> but it is really irrelevant for the bug on setting up a council project to begin with +14:19 < kent\n> The gist though I think its "Council should have a thing maybe", and we can work out the details later? +14:20 <@rich0> yup +14:20 <@K_F> "maybe"? +14:20 < kent\n> (~ no point in researching how if council decide it not wanted ) +14:20 < dwfreed> the issue with being a component under a product vs being your own product is that you don't have further categorization possible if you're a component +14:21 * WilliamH still thinks gentoo council should be a product not a component +14:21 <@ulm> +1 +14:22 < kent\n> Yeah. It is more future proof. +14:22 <@K_F> yup +14:22 <@K_F> and not confusing users as its not selectable by default +14:22 <@K_F> similar to trustees +14:23 <@WilliamH> Who is supposed to be working on this bug? +14:23 < kent\n> Can we think of 2 potential sub-categories of Council as a starter? +14:23 <@K_F> WilliamH: waiting for infra action +14:24 <@WilliamH> K_F: ah ok. +14:24 <@ulm> but maybe we should clarify that we want a product? +14:24 <@WilliamH> ulm: that seems pretty clear from the bug +14:24 <@K_F> no harm in confirming it again after this discussion +14:25 <@ulm> K_F: can you take care of it? +14:25 <@K_F> yup +14:25 <@WilliamH> ok, moving on... +14:25 <@WilliamH> open floor. +14:25 * WilliamH listens +14:26 <@ulm> it was suggested that we should get council approval on the current pms version again +14:26 <@WilliamH> why? +14:26 <@ulm> because there were a few clarifications, mainly on scope of variables +14:27 <@K_F> the FILESDIR and PATCHES one? +14:27 <@WilliamH> Do we have to approve clarifications? +14:27 <@ulm> K_F: yep, plus DISTDIR, WORKDIR, S, A, AA +14:27 <@ulm> WilliamH: that's the question +14:28 <@K_F> the clafification seems well within bounds of how I was thinking it to begin with, but I've seen the discussions so don't have any issue re-confirming it +14:28 <@K_F> can you write up a proposal for statement? +14:28 <@ulm> K_F: I can do for the next meeting +14:28 <@ulm> also including a list of changes +14:28 <@K_F> yeah, either next meeting or just a bug in mean time should be fine +14:28 <@WilliamH> sgtm +14:29 <@ulm> yeah, bug sounds good +14:30 <@WilliamH> anything else? +14:30 * WilliamH bangs the gavel.... meeting closed +14:31 <@WilliamH> Thanks folks. :-) diff --git a/meeting-logs/20170409.txt.asc b/meeting-logs/20170409.txt.asc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..14cfef0 --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-logs/20170409.txt.asc @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEnB9e/J8YI6T0NBsJm0Co7cr65zMFAljqqDsACgkQm0Co7cr6 +5zP6XQ//eCShVXfUBrj+waeOJc/VqwWXa9fXOo6oIUzkTCRj1ckPrbPTuH+qL91d +nMkjKWdKEBjzZA7atEsLKUGAUCgVZhbsdrMFRgDOWrt7WI4syZFRGtoTvGyW7BGs +Q0NhxoltgZJJwwtglH0SMyenGAJxTyVlUBJ619XhZt93iiEqj9KwdZ50eDgP80ID +ZXWPU39noSsGI9x/NCwr8Vw28PunLBMuJ0f7hfSTM4F87E5FPhB/H6yyYKcI+5RH +tArTG1uuoCO37H+Vlne+Xeu4Cvnm/DSA+xFNVMjDBPJ07Z3PhQzHsDuSLx00Upf/ +rH3DTnXWvJUe4DHTYmQeibmkr0HYg/cIcvXdDNXKLJ++um7MM24Ip1E87ddZRqCO +WrU74SPTIyNoCTE2lnM+tvi1ItZmX5bZixf/Gv+jA4dnVEboa6HoczOyDrxnKMRQ ++eJ9ah4D09xRrJYMuuxDoPhCJ3GFVBrPfvigLVg4QggYkdTvoAxq8x4GDqIUMOKb +B9+qs1vHCo8+Ew3NFKazKmBVXooIP8BgGiyiP0eFAHrPC3K8htWq3NcUdtI23/Fw +IVnSIUG4SXijJ1w2ed/OcjcNt8IU2yH/yzRQtwwaSny4Lt4zojCdiUPCczb3t83q +cjinnHKPOlJeqV0KfWM6YVumBkGU6h5vnGHgZ2LCSZblMX6FVks= +=2vVJ +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |