1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20090226.tex b/decisions/summary-20090226.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a7693e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20090226.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+
+\summary{2009}{2}{26}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open Council Spot}
+\index{council!members}
+
+Should leio fill the empty council spot?
+
+        Since Mark(halcy0n) resigned from the council there is an empty spot.
+        Since Mart Raudsepp(leio) is ranked next from the last election, he is
+        eligible to fill the spot.
+
+        Conclusion:
+            Mart Raudsepp is unanimously approved for the council.
+
+
+\agendaitem{GLEP 55}
+\index{GLEP!55}
+
+        There had been quite a bit of discussion on this topic recently.
+        Within hours of the council meeting new proposals were being proposed
+        and discussion was ongoing. 
+
+        Conclusion:
+            No decision as of yet. Ciaran Mccreesh(ciaranm) and Zac
+            Medico(zmedico) volunteered to benchmark the various proposals on
+            the package managers they maintain(paludis and portage
+            respectively. Petteri(Betelgeuse) will assist with the portage
+	    benchmarks. Tiziano(dev-zero) and Alec Warner(antarus) will write
+            up a comparison of the various proposals and their various
+            advantages and disadvantages within a week.
+
+\agendaitem{GLEP 54}
+\index{GLEP!54}
+
+        There had been some discussion on gentoo-dev since last meeting,
+        though no consensus or agreement had been reached(surprise!)
+
+        Conclusion:
+            Thomas Anderson(tanderson) and Luca Barbato(lu_zero) will write up
+            a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two
+            proposals(-scm and _live). This will be completed within a week.
+
+            
+\agendaitem{Overlay Masking in Repositories}
+\index{package.unmask}\index{overlays}
+
+        Brian Harring(ferringb) asked for discussion for when overlays
+        attempted to unmask packages provided by the master 
+        repository(gentoo-x86). Because this is only available in portage
+        (it is contrary to PMS), Brian thought it should not be allowed.
+        
+        Numerous suggestions were made to the effect that if a standardized
+        set format was agreed upon for repositories and package.unmask was
+        allowed to contain sets, then this problem would be fixed.
+
+        Conclusion:
+            No decision, as only discussion was requested. Mart Raudsepp(leio)
+	    will follow up on this with discussion on gentoo-dev