summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'decisions/summary-20090514.tex')
-rw-r--r--decisions/summary-20090514.tex71
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20090514.tex b/decisions/summary-20090514.tex
index 3f2323f..ffac6d3 100644
--- a/decisions/summary-20090514.tex
+++ b/decisions/summary-20090514.tex
@@ -1,62 +1,63 @@
\summary{2009}{5}{14}
+Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{eca4a1b50265194c3b0bcc7a815f470a}
+
+Agenda announcement: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{f6324426bcfdb42588b0337a37103209}
+
\agendaitem{Approve wording of PMS for EAPI 3}
\index{EAPI!3}\index{EAPI!3!approval}
- This call for approval comes from the perspective that package manager
- developers currently do not know the specifics of what to code for
- EAPI 3. With this approved package manager developers can write code
- and testcases for each feature and know that the specifics of each
- feature is final(some features may be removed however).
+This call for approval comes from the perspective that package manager
+developers currently do not know the specifics of what to code for EAPI 3. With
+this approved package manager developers can write code and testcases for each
+feature and know that the specifics of each feature is final(some features may
+be removed however).
- Conclusion:
- Approved, EAPI 3 specifications have been merged to the main PMS
- repository. EAPI 3 will be tagged when developers are able to use
- it.
+Conclusion: Approved, EAPI 3 specifications have been merged to the main PMS
+repository. EAPI 3 will be tagged when developers are able to use it.
\agendaitem{Vote on GLEP 54}
\index{GLEP!54!approval}
- This vote was called for by dertobi123. The vote was on whether to
- approve \glep{54} conditional on whether is passed. The reason
- for this is that \glep{54} is unimplementable without the problems
- mentioned in \glep{55} being solved.
+This vote was called for by \dev{dertobi123}. The vote was on whether to
+approve \glep{54} conditional on whether is passed. The reason for this is
+that GLEP 54 is unimplementable without the problems mentioned in \glep{55}
+being solved.
+
+Conclusion: Conditionally approved on whether \glep{55} is approved.
- Conclusion:
- Conditionally approved on whether \glep{55} is approved.
\agendaitem{Vote on GLEP 55}
- A vote was required on this GLEP since \glep{54} was already passed
- conditional on this vote.
- Conclusion:
- After quite a bit of confusion in the voting (people changing their
- votes), a tie(3-3) vote was reached. Therefore, no decision was
- reached. This vote will be brought up again next meeting so that
- the tie can be broken(hopefully with everyone present).
+A vote was required on \glep{55} since \glep{54} was already passed conditional
+on this vote.
+
+Conclusion: After quite a bit of confusion in the voting (people changing their
+votes), a tie (3-3) vote was reached. Therefore, no decision was reached. This
+vote will be brought up again next meeting so that the tie can be broken
+(hopefully with everyone present).
\agendaitem{Discussion of dropping static libraries automatically}
\index{static libraries}\index{libraries!static}\index{EAPI!4}
- Peter Alfredsen(loki_val) asked the council to discuss the ability to
- automatically drop static libraries from installs and the best way to
- do so.
+\dev{loki_val} asked the council to discuss the ability to automatically drop
+static libraries from installs and the best way to do so.
- Conclusion:
- The council unanimously voted that developers, at their
- discretion, can drop static libraries but it will not be the
- default. The council also expressed support for an EAPI 4 proposal
- to automatically disable static libraries via configure options.
+Conclusion: The council unanimously voted that developers, at their discretion,
+can drop static libraries but it will not be the default. The council also
+expressed support for an EAPI 4 proposal to automatically disable static
+libraries via configure options.
\agendaitem{Council Election Update}
- The election team decided to hold nominations for the Gentoo Council
- from June 1st to June 14th with the voting period running from June
- 16th to June 30th. Results will likely be announced on July 2nd. The
- election officials for this election are NeddySeagoon, rane, and
- jmbsvicetto with fox2mike as the infrastructed liaison.
+The election team decided to hold nominations for the Gentoo Council from June
+1st to June 14th with the voting period running from June 16th to June 30th.
+Results will likely be announced on July 2nd. The election officials for this
+election are \dev{neddyseagoon}, \dev{rane}, and \dev{jmbsvicetto} with
+\dev{fox2mike} as the infrastructure liaison.\footnote{This part is not in the
+official meeting log.}