1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20090611.tex b/decisions/summary-20090611.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fa57539
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20090611.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+
+\summary{2009}{6}{11}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Short discussion of EAPI 3 progress}
+\index{EAPI!3}\index{portage}\index{paludis}
+
+Reference: \bug{273620}
+
+        Zac Medico(zmedico) commented that while no progress had been made, a
+        tracker bug had been made for those interested in providing patches
+        for and tracking the progress of the EAPI 3 implementation. Ciaran
+        McCreesh noted that paludis is ready for EAPI 3 whenever the portage
+        implementation is finished.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Default contents of ACCEPT_LICENSE(license filtering)}
+\index{ACCEPT_LICENSE}
+
+\glep{23} provided a method for users to select what licenses they are
+        willing to accept based on a ACCEPT_LICENSE configuration variable. In
+        addition it provided for 'license groups' so users could accept or
+        decline to use software of a certain license type. What GLEP 23 did not
+        specify was the default value of ACCEPT_LICENSE.
+
+        Conclusion:
+            The council unanimously voted to have the default ACCEPT_LICENSE
+            value as ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA".
+
+
+\agendaitem{BASH 4 in EAPI 3}
+\index{EAPI!3}\index{bash!version in ebuilds}
+
+        There were three parts to this topic:
+\begin{enumerate}
+ \item 
+ Unlocking of feature requests for EAPI 3.
+ \item
+ Allowing BASH 4 features in EAPI 3 ebuilds.
+ \item
+ Allowing BASH 4 features in all ebuilds with EAPIs $>=$ 3 after a 
+               fixed amount of time in gentoo-x86(Overlays could begin use
+               immediately).
+\end{enumerate}
+
+        Conclusion:
+            By a 4-3 decision the council voted not to open the feature list for
+            EAPI 3.
+
+
+\agendaitem{The banning of igli (Steve Long) from \#gentoo-council}
+\index{irc!\#gentoo-council}\index{irc!ban}
+
+        Tiziano Muller(dev-zero) banned igli from \#-council for what he called
+        repeated trolling after private warnings. The ban was later reversed by
+        Doug Goldstein(Cardoe) because it had not been put to a council vote as
+        all bans in \#-council are.
+
+        Conclusion:
+            No decision yet, the council decided to discuss this issue privately
+            on the council@ alias so that precious meeting time is not spent.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Define EAPI development/deployment cycles}
+
+Reference: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{d3a4758c455fded00608e891f525d3cc}
+
+        Various Council members expressed support for Ciaran McCreesh's EAPI
+        development guidelines. However, the discussion
+        reached no conclusion and quickly spiraled into a discussion of the
+        removal of Ciaran McCreesh's bugzilla privileges.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Removal of Ciaran McCreesh's (ciaranm) bugzilla permissions}
+
+        At some point in the last year ciaranm's bugzilla permissions were
+        removed. He filed a bug about the issue (\bug{273759}) and was talking 
+about
+        moving PMS off of Gentoo Infrastructure, a move that some council
+        members were strongly opposed to. When asked about the permissions,
+        Ciaran had no objections to waiting a few days for the infra to complete
+        an investigation into who removed the access and for what reason.
+
+        Conclusion:
+            The council voted to reinstate Ciaran's editbugs privileges. Ned
+            Ludd (solar) noted that infra will investigate who removed the privileges
+            in the first place, and asked for not changing bugzilla privileges before
+            this is completed.