summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'decisions/summary-20100726.tex')
-rw-r--r--decisions/summary-20100726.tex90
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20100726.tex b/decisions/summary-20100726.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d2408a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20100726.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+
+\summary{2010}{7}{26}
+
+
+\agendaitem{add --as-needed to default profile's LDFLAGS}
+\index{--as-needed}\index{LDFLAGS}
+
+passed by unanimous vote;
+ scarabeus will create a news item,
+ ssuominen already pushed the actual change :D
+
+
+\agendaitem{REQUIRED_USE}
+\index{REQUIRED_USE}
+
+Reference: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html (dead link)
+
+Accepted by all members
+
+
+\agendaitem{Review eclass removal policy}
+\index{eclasses!removal}
+
+Should it be 2 years since portage 2.1.4.4 went stable?
+
+$\longrightarrow$ all members agreed on removing the 2
+year policy
+
+$\longrightarrow$ QA will write a devmanual patch with a
+30+ minimum lastrite period for eclass removals
+
+
+\agendaitem{Should there a policy about eclass API changes?}
+\index{eclasses!api changes}
+
+$\longrightarrow$ we didn't reach a decision here, talk will
+continue in the mailing lists
+
+
+\agendaitem{Use of invalid DEPEND atom "EAPI_TOO_OLD" instead of calling die in
+global scope on eclasses}
+\index{EAPI_TOO_OLD}\index{die!in global scope}\index{PMS}
+
+Reference: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{dee3aab5e8c840ed3fa4add9c7d74b97} and
+replies
+
+The council opted for calling die
+instead of using the invalid DEPEND and required
+a patch to devmanual and PMS (ferring will do the devmanual patch)
+
+
+\agendaitem{Mailing lists}
+\index{mailing list!gentoo-council}
+\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev}
+\index{mailing list!gentoo-project}
+\index{council!meeting agenda}
+
+Should we post council agenda to -council? -dev? -project?
+
+Some devs suggest we should cross-post to -dev and -council
+but not everyone likes cross-posting as it can lead to fragmentation.
+Petteri suggested punting -council and using -project instead
+
+$\longrightarrow$ there was a vote on punting -council
+that ended in a 2-2 tie (ferringb had left)
+jmbsvicetto and wired voted against, betelgeuse and scarabeus voted in favor
+
+
+$\longrightarrow$ discussion will be continued in the
+mailing lists
+
+\agendaitem{Bugs assigned to council@g.o}
+
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item
+ \bug{234706}: ask Halcy0n if he wants to resume work on this
+bug
+ \item
+ \bug{256451}: ask ferringb if he still wants to do it
+ \item
+ \bug{256453}: wired will take care of this
+ \item
+ \bug{237381}: jmbsvicetto will take care of this
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open floor: listen to developers}
+
+$\longrightarrow$ no input...
+