1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20110809.tex b/decisions/summary-20110809.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..326ea67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/summary-20110809.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+
+\summary{2011}{8}{9}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Required advance notice for council meetings}
+\index{council!meeting process}
+
+\vote{7 days vs 2 days}{Result: 1-week notice is required}
+
+\vote{If 7 days notice is required: can the agenda be sent with only 2-day 
+notice?}{Draft agendas should also be sent 1 week in advance}
+
+
+\agendaitem{ChangeLog autogeneration}
+\index{ChangeLog!autogeneration}\index{ChangeLog}
+
+Reference: \agoref{gentoo-project}{3675d8a397ee2b5b3088df42e3352b6f}
+
+Previous council already voted for autogeneration (20110608)
+
+\vote{Should we allow filtering of which commits show up?}{No filtering, on a 
+4-3 vote}
+
+\vote{Retroactively change existing entries, yes or no.}{We will append to 
+changelogs and retain all existing changelog messages.}
+
+We may need to return to this when the git migration is ready. 
+       Current changelog messages will be old by then, so they won't be 
+       as interesting anymore, and people should have adjusted.
+
+Do we need a way to edit autogenerated changelogs to fix typos, 
+     etc? Should there be a backing store to overwrite messages? 
+     jmbsvicetto will reopen discussion about this.
+
+
+\agendaitem{IRC cloaks: gentoo/user/cloaks}
+\index{IRC cloaks!gentoo/user}
+
+Reference: \agoref{gentoo-project}{5471f2db793e7fe9f50038fb23258c66}
+
+\vote{Should we delegate this to devrel and userrel to work out?}{No decision 
+was reached. Opinions were mixed on whether 
+     council should be involved, whether it fell under devrel or 
+     whether Freenode group contacts were even connected to devrel.
+     Further discussion on lists might help clarify how things should work.}
+
+     
+\agendaitem{Use of the gentoo-council mailing list}
+\index{mailing list!gentoo-council}
+
+Reference: \agoref{gentoo-council}{6cad9409772fa44415e84005ff922145}
+
+\vote{Should the -council mailing list again be used for discussion 
+     of council agenda items?}{No. -dev, -project, and the council alias is 
+enough.}
+
+Update the -council list bug to indicate that the list should be closed.
+
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open bugs with council involvement}
+
+---
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open floor - listen to the community}
+
+---
+
+
+\agendaitem{Items proposed but not on the agenda}
+\index{runtime dependencies!optional}
+
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item 
+ Optional runtime dependencies, 
+ \agoref{gentoo-dev}{2342bd1cad57e432a319c55e3ef7e6df}: 
+ What is the decision to be made? If none, it's not on the agenda
+ \item
+ Council terms: overlapping 2-year terms, 
+ \agoref{gentoo-project}{f0e61e95ea9027d7c937e5ae956adb0d}:
+ Requires a full developer vote on changes to \glep{39} so council 
+     approval is not relevant
+\end{itemize}