\summary{2008}{2}{14}

Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{eedef3ff358221e8dd267182f8ff9103}


\agendaitem{Code of Conduct enforcement}
\index{Code of Conduct!enforcement}


\dev{dberkholz} posted a simple suggestion to -council last night, see the
\agoref{gentoo-council}{ba125098c929ea31f34051dfb009d436}. The basic idea is to 
just promote individual developers responding to people who are being jerks. 
Privately, unless things get out of hand. Council supported the implementation.
\dev{dberkholz} will get things going.


\agendaitem{Document of being an active developer}
\index{developer certificate}\index{project!devrel}

Updates: \dev{araujo} was working on a script to automatically insert data into 
XML in scribus or inkscape formats. He said he would work on it this weekend.

Creating the template file is on hold pending a format decision from this
script project.

Any news from devrel on key? \dev{dberkholz} pinged \dev{musikc} for an update.


\agendaitem{Slacker arches}
\index{arches!slacking}

There was no news on this issue.


\agendaitem{GLEP 54: scm package version suffix}
\index{GLEP!54}\index{scm version suffix}


Concerning \glep{54}, none of the planned discussion on gentoo-dev took place. 
No resubmission to the council was done.


\agendaitem{GLEP 55: Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)}
\index{GLEP!55}\index{EAPI suffix}


Concerning \glep{55}, none of the planned discussion on gentoo-dev took place. 
No resubmission to the council was done.


\agendaitem{GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml}
\index{metadata.xml}\index{upstream tags}

References:
\begin{itemize}
 \item 
 \glep{46}
 \item
 \agoref{gentoo-dev}{46d474d621455bc204654dc483e87cc5}
\end{itemize}

The GLEP was approved, with a caveat: Questions were raised about requiring 
http:// and https:// only. What about ftp:// ? What about no limitation, and 
requiring tools to throw out protocols they don't recognize? Why is that 
restriction there?

Once those questions are resolved, the GLEP will be finalized.


\agendaitem{EAPI=1: Where is the approved specification?}
\index{EAPI!1}\index{EAPI!0}\index{PMS}

Reference: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{e1b4a369534e30b8a64c6c6429cfe729}

A long discussion was had about whether we should continue using EAPI=1 when we 
don't have EAPI=0 approved, reverting EAPI=1, and the value of specifications in 
producing quality code. People generally agreed about not adding any new EAPIs 
until the PMS for EAPI=0 is approved, but there wasn't agreement on changing 
anything about EAPI=1.

To make forward progress, \dev{halcy0n} agreed to work on getting the PMS ready 
for EAPI=0. He asked for anyone else interested to contact him so we can get it 
done and approved ASAP.

\dev{halcy0n} will give us an update at the next council meeting.