\summary{2011}{2}{1} \agendaitem{Slacker arches} \index{arches!slacking} After a brief discussion about the ml thread, Jorge raised a few concerns about the proposed policy increasing arch teams work and not addressing the issue of lacking hardware. It was decided that Tomas will write a proposal based on the ml thread and that Jorge will try to talk to the arch teams and trustees to see if there is or not a hardware issue and if so will try to address it. \agendaitem{EAPI 4} \index{EAPI!4!approval}\index{EAPI!usage when bumping} The council already approved and published the use of EAPI-4 for testing ebuilds in the tree - mail sent by Alex. While mentioning this point, Tomas recalled his question about changing policy to have developers use the latest EAPI whenever possible, which lead to a long discussion about deprecating EAPI versions and upgrade paths, to be continued in the MLs. \agendaitem{GLEP 48} \index{GLEP!48}\index{project!qa} There was a very long discussion about "authority" and "powers" and whether QA should or not have be able to suspend developer's commit privileges. No consensus was reached and as proposed in the agenda, the GLEP was sent back to be updated with current requests and for further discussion on MLs. \agendaitem{Open floor} No issue was brought forward to the council