\summary{2017}{6}{11}

Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-project}{311aa9019263ee4e4ef68300ce3e4a46}

Agenda announcement: --- none ---

\agendaitem{Open bugs with council involvement}
\index{project!qa}

\begin{itemize}
 \item 
 \bug{618930}: \dev{pinkbyte} was confirmed as QA lead with 5 yes votes and 2 
 abstentions.
 \item
 \bug{618254}: (Non-public discussion.)
\end{itemize}

\agendaitem{Open floor}
\index{bugzilla!package list}\index{stabilization}\index{developer!jer}

\dev{soap} brought up the topic of the stabilization workflow and the new 
package list field in bugzilla. Specifically he asked for votes on two topics, 
\begin{itemize}
 \item 
 that the package maintainer is responsible for initiating stabilization, i.e., 
 if stabilization is requested by someone else the maintainer has to confirm
 \item 
 that only the package maintainer is allowed to modify the package list field
\end{itemize}
As a result also a discussion on specifying the package list format ensued. No 
vote was taken; the topic was deferred to the lists for decision at the next 
meeting.