1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
\summary{2007}{1}{11}
Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{2406f61ebe526f4f3d9e23227aa1b96b}
\agendaitem{EAPI 0 draft}
\index{EAPI!0}\index{PMS}
\dev{kugelfang} reported that the EAPI 0 draft document is not quite complete.
\dev{spb} had hoped to have it ready before the meeting, but didn't manage. It
has been restricted thus far to avoid 'large discussions about minor details'
while the bigger picture is assembled. It will be open for all input and
refinements later.
\agendaitem{/usr/libexec}
\index{/usr/libexec}\index{FHS}
\dev{kugelfang} visited the issue of the contents of /usr/libexec.
\dev{flameeyes} and \dev{vapier} had raised it previously, and \dev{kugelfang}
is working on a standard for where to put things in a Gentoo installation, in a
style similar to FHS.
\agendaitem{Retirement / stepping down of a council member}
\index{council!members!retiring}\index{developer!flameeyes!retirement}
\dev{kugelfang} wanted to know about the process for council members stepping
down. This was prompted by solely by \dev{flameeyes}'s message to the council
channel earlier in the day, which implied he was retiring. The point was made
moot by his later blog post that he was going to take a two week break instead.
On the procedural side, both \dev{kugelfang} and \dev{kingtaco} wanted to know
what the what the process for a retiring council member was. Should it be the
next person on the original ballot results, or should a further election be
held? The spirit of the council GLEP was a further election, but some questions
were had in this. The issue needs to be raised on the -dev mailing list, and
revisited during the next council meeting.
\agendaitem{Bugzilla and CVS}
\index{bugzilla}\index{cvs.gentoo.org}\index{bugs.gentoo.org}
\dev{robbat2} reported on the successful bugzilla migration, and the work for
the new CVS server. The Bugzilla news was well recieved.
\agendaitem{SPF}
\index{SPF}
\dev{robbat2} brought up the status of the SPF documentation. \dev{kloeri} said
that he has them in a nearly finished state, but hasn't had a chance lately to
complete them. Kloeri will other complete them shortly, or upload the drafts
to the bug in the meantime.
\agendaitem{Meeting agendas}
\index{council!meeting!agenda}
\dev{robbat2} requested that for helping to get an agenda together in future,
all council members should just braindump their potential minor items to the
council mailing list a few days ahead of each meeting. Large issues should
still be raised on -dev/-core as needed, but the smaller stuff like followups
can just be braindumped. \dev{robbat2} promised to rig an automated reminder to
the council members.
\agendaitem{Reply-To}
\index{Reply-To}
\dev{wolf31o2} inquired as to the status of the Reply-To documentation
(\bug{154595}). As there was absolutely no progress, \dev{wolf31o2} was going to
just write it up and convert it to GuideXML.
\agendaitem{Council-managed projects}
\index{council-managed projects}\index{projects!council-managed}
\dev{wolf31o2} proposed the concept of council-managed projects. These are to be
Gentoo-specific projects where the council takes the initiative of defining
creating software specifications and requirements, recruits people to work on
them (not nessicarily developers), and helps manage the project (leaving people
to actually work on it). Some past almost precedents were noted and the council
was in favour of the general concept. \dev{wolf31o2} was going to seek out some
initial proposals for small projects to test the concept on.
\agendaitem{Open Floor}
\index{Sealand}\index{foundation}
\dev{kingtaco} jokingly asked if the Gentoo Foundation could afford to buy
Sealand, which lead into real queries about the current financial reports.
\dev{wolf31o2} located a November 2006 posting in the NFP archives and provided
a link to it.\footnote{Not identifiable in the list archives.}
|
GitWeb