blob: cfd3a6d0fb3d24a505fc4cad67af1312829d19ef (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
\summary{2007}{4}{12}
\agendaitem{Code of Conduct}
\index{Code of Conduct}
amne has been doing a good job putting the group together.
Ask proctors to address these two issues for next meeting:
\begin{itemize}
\item
add a "mission" statement
\item
fix wording to have a positive spin
\end{itemize}
\agendaitem{Sync Social Contract with Gentoo Foundation (external entities)}
\index{Social Contract}\index{trustees}
trustees will review the statement to clarify things and then
we'll look again at syncing
\agendaitem{Documentation for mail servers}
They are supposed to be finished in terms of content.
Wolf will look at getting them actually committed.
\agendaitem{PMS}
\index{PMS}
Current status looks good in getting issues resolved.
Should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting.
Let the devs sort out the todo as the current work flow seems
to be getting things done finally
\agendaitem{Splitting gentoo-dev mailing lists}
\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev}\index{project!proctors}
no real favorable backing for this
people dont like -dev because of the crap, splitting the lists
will just move the crap else where, not really solving anything
let proctors do their thing and if need be, review this again
\agendaitem{Limiting of council powers}
There doesnt seem to be real backing for this from dev community or
the council itself
If a majority of developers are truly upset/disturbed by a
council decision, it should show easily
If you dont like a council member, dont vote for them next time
\agendaitem{Moving gentoo-core to public archives}
\index{mailing list!gentoo-core}
Many people dislike this moving forward
Use -dev over -core for most things
Not going to happen at this time
Look into getting a dev-only archive finally
\agendaitem{Surveys}
\index{surveys}
robbat2 will look at getting user/dev surveys in place after the
release of 2007.0
probably try and take fresh surveys after each bi-annual release
from now on to see if we're meeting many of users' desires
\agendaitem{New metastructure proposal}
Doesnt seem to address any of the problems it proposes to
A large majority of developers and users prefer the single tree
development style that Gentoo has versus many smaller trees
|
GitWeb