summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: 285722a9f7e4a1cbed579b8c7e0025d5de09419f (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
\summary{2008}{7}{24}

Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{36e31e8ccd47b158d171dbc7661e324e}

Agenda announcement: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{8afbbe16f24b23d5173ecec3514bce36}


\agendaitem{Ongoing appeal procedures}

The council has come to a decision on the currently running appeal procedures.  
We will be sending emails to the parties involved directly before sending 
anything out publically.


\agendaitem{Userrel authority}
\index{project!userrel}\index{Code of Conduct!enforcement}

Reference: \agoref{gentoo-council}{eac45e89236eac6e6a73736b70156927}

\vote{Does userrel have the authority to enforce the Code of Conduct on users 
like devrel does for developers?}{Approved with 6 yes votes}

It was decided that userrel does have this authority.\footnote{However, ability 
might be the problem --- quoting, ``we can ban names but not people''.}


\agendaitem{Code of Conduct extent}
\index{Code of Conduct!extent}\index{mailing list!ban}\index{irc!ban}

Reference: \agoref{gentoo-council}{dc698c8d19846dbe6e5a812bb5dd0880}

All council members will review the Code of Conduct thread and comment on it by 
the next meeting (7 August 2008).  We will get a status update in that meeting 
to see if we can vote on any of the proposals brought up in that thread.