summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: e57b6c0164c1c794e9e71d40359cd94671ef9bc5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
\summary{2009}{4}{9}

Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{cb09023632b22578d7b257ed2c809974}


\agendaitem{Migration of KEYWORDS out of ebuilds}
\index{KEYWORDS}

There was initial discussion on the idea to KEYWORDS out of ebuilds into a 
separate package.keywords file or similar. The council requested that 
\dev{solar} post a draft proposal of his idea to one of the lists for 
discussion, since the idea interested the council and they wish to get an idea 
of its pros and cons.


\agendaitem{EAPI 3 features}
\index{EAPI!3}\index{mtime preservation}

To make sure that there is enough discussion on all EAPI 3 features a block on 
new features for consideration into EAPI 3 was considered. A vote was taken on 
the following alternatives:
\begin{enumerate}
 \item 
 block features to those already discussed
 \item
 option '1', but additionally include mtime preservation
 \item
 no block for features
\end{enumerate}
Choice '1' won with 4 votes.

This block doesn't affect discussion of the implementation of the features, 
only new features.


\agendaitem{EAPI 3 updates}

\dev{zmedico} commented that while he hadn't worked on [use(+/-)] yet it 
shouldn't take more than a week or two to complete.