blob: 155d97839fef0130688e43747038015d1a5609b9 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
\summary{2010}{7}{26}
\agendaitem{add --as-needed to default profile's LDFLAGS}
\index{as-needed}\index{--as-needed}\index{LDFLAGS}
passed by unanimous vote;
scarabeus will create a news item,
ssuominen already pushed the actual change :D
\agendaitem{REQUIRED_USE}
\index{REQUIRED_USE}
Reference: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html (dead link)
Accepted by all members
\agendaitem{Review eclass removal policy}
\index{eclasses!removal}
Should it be 2 years since portage 2.1.4.4 went stable?
$\longrightarrow$ all members agreed on removing the 2
year policy
$\longrightarrow$ QA will write a devmanual patch with a
30+ minimum lastrite period for eclass removals
\agendaitem{Should there a policy about eclass API changes?}
\index{eclasses!api changes}
$\longrightarrow$ we didn't reach a decision here, talk will
continue in the mailing lists
\agendaitem{Use of invalid DEPEND atom "EAPI_TOO_OLD" instead of calling die in
global scope on eclasses}
\index{EAPI_TOO_OLD}\index{die!in global scope}\index{PMS}
Reference: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{dee3aab5e8c840ed3fa4add9c7d74b97} and
replies
The council opted for calling die
instead of using the invalid DEPEND and required
a patch to devmanual and PMS (ferring will do the devmanual patch)
\agendaitem{Mailing lists}
\index{mailing list!gentoo-council}
\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev}
\index{mailing list!gentoo-project}
\index{council!meeting!agenda}
Should we post council agenda to -council? -dev? -project?
Some devs suggest we should cross-post to -dev and -council
but not everyone likes cross-posting as it can lead to fragmentation.
Petteri suggested punting -council and using -project instead
$\longrightarrow$ there was a vote on punting -council
that ended in a 2-2 tie (ferringb had left)
jmbsvicetto and wired voted against, betelgeuse and scarabeus voted in favor
$\longrightarrow$ discussion will be continued in the
mailing lists
\agendaitem{Bugs assigned to council@g.o}
\begin{itemize}
\item
\bug{234706}: ask Halcy0n if he wants to resume work on this
bug
\item
\bug{256451}: ask ferringb if he still wants to do it
\item
\bug{256453}: wired will take care of this
\item
\bug{237381}: jmbsvicetto will take care of this
\end{itemize}
\agendaitem{Open floor: listen to developers}
$\longrightarrow$ no input...
|
GitWeb