blob: 51d803df214603ed177ff2092395d7d843e751bd (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
|
\summary{2012}{12}{11}
\agendaitem{Handling separate /usr support}
\index{separate /usr}\index{package!sys-fs/udev}\index{package!sys-fs/eudev}
\index{/usr merge}
Reference: \url{https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/303}
After the discussion during the previous meeting, a delay of one
month due to a new fork of udev was requested. We need an update on
what's happened.
Chainsaw reported udev and eudev have moved on, and for both it is now
possible to have a separate /usr. The follow-up discussion related to
the /usr-merge is necessary.
\agendaitem{Open bugs with council involvement}
\bug{383467}: ulm has done some work here, but master ballots for 2011 and 2012
are still missing
\agendaitem{Open Floor}
\index{gen_usr_ldscript}
gen_usr_ldscript() vs --libdir=/lib. Questions on why, and if it makes
sense to remove gen_usr_ldscript in favour of --libdir. WilliamH will
open a discussion on gentoo-dev ML.
|
GitWeb
