blob: fb7349e5a45f2d09c392d4d17768cac8a3922f4f (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
Council 2012/05/08 meeting summary
==================================
Agenda
------
* Introduction and roll call (5 minutes)
* EAPI specification in ebuilds [2] (20 minutes)
1. Vote on final PMS wording [3] (discussion [4])
2. Vote to change the status of GLEP55 [5]
* Separate /usr partition vote of last meeting (20 minutes)
Following the vote about Gentoo supporting separate /usr
installations in the last meeting, the mls became active
about the meaning and consequences of such vote.
William made a direct request to the council to review the
vote [6].
* Review of the council term (10 minutes)
Roy suggested [7] the council members do a review of their
mandate in the last meeting before the election.
* Open floor
[1] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/utctolocal.html?time=1900
[2] -
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_e6eafd6be25794ca503e0ac9d6968cd3.xml
[3] -
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-pms/msg_3a441be5e49cc06689ecab00da461278.xml
[4] -
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-pms/msg_ef7635aa655913f2386e64e385f5a6ae.xml
[5] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0055.html
[6] -
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_5a3e7a62abc3f6f529cbb18d85f2fbcf.xml
[7] -
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_0e09e374488d2393c6cf794e349dc614.xml
Meeting
-------
* roll call
here:
Betelgeuse (late)
chainsaw
dberkholz
grobian
hwoarang
jmbsvicetto
ulm
* vote/discuss:
* EAPI specification in ebuilds
* Vote on final PMS wording
The council approved with 6 yes votes the final PMS wording as submitted on
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_e6eafd6be25794ca503e0ac9d6968cd3.xml
* Vote to change the status of GLEP55
The council approved with 6 yes votes to change the status of GLEP55 to rejected.
Per Ulrich's suggestion, the GLEP status heading will be changed to "the council
rejected this GLEP in its 2012-05-08 meeting in favor of parsing the EAPI from
the first non-blank and non-comment line of ebuilds.
* Separate /usr partition vote of last meeting
Following the discussions in the dev and project threads about the last meeting
vote on the separate /usr partition as well as the thread on this meeting's agenda,
the council members agreed that as Tony stated "sufficient understanding & agreement
has been built on the mailing lists".
* Review of the council term
As suggested by Roy, the council members did a review of this council term.
Tony remarked he feels this council did particularly well on attendance. Fabian
collected his thoughts on http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/achievements-council-1112.txt
Donnie suggests having fewer rotating chairs and have them do a few meetings in
a row to improve efficiency. Jorge also noted that picking chairs in advance
does help getting meetings prepared. Several members argued be prepared is very
important. Petteri noted council members should be proactive and Jorge noted how
work got a toll on his time for council duties.
Donnie was bothered by the "red tape" and the amount of time council spent on issues
that weren't really up to it. He also maintains the believe that innovations should
be pushed by individuals and that the council should do everything to quickly get out
of the way.
* Open bugs with council involvement
* bug 383467
Jorge noted this bug was his and that the council voting results are already available
at the elections page http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/ . He also promised
to complete the conversion of the 2005 nominees file, fix the master ballot for last year
election as noted by Ulrich, to drop http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/#doc_chap9
and link back to the elections page.
* bug 411069
Ulrich argued the council shouldn't be CC'ed on this bug and as other council members
agreed this isn't a council issue, the council has been removed from CC of this bug.
* next meeting:
Tuesday, 20120612 1900 UTC
* open floor:
No issues were brought to the council attention.
|
GitWeb