summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: 538cbd75da3c3b9717f05386daf68767aef3aac8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE glsa SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/glsa.dtd">
<glsa id="201110-05">
  <title>GnuTLS: Multiple vulnerabilities</title>
  <synopsis>Multiple vulnerabilities were found in GnuTLS, allowing for easier
    man-in-the-middle attacks.
  </synopsis>
  <product type="ebuild">gnutls</product>
  <announced>October 10, 2011</announced>
  <revised>October 10, 2011: 1</revised>
  <bug>281224</bug>
  <bug>292025</bug>
  <access>remote</access>
  <affected>
    <package name="net-libs/gnutls" auto="yes" arch="*">
      <unaffected range="ge">2.10.0</unaffected>
      <vulnerable range="lt">2.10.0</vulnerable>
    </package>
  </affected>
  <background>
    <p>GnuTLS is an Open Source implementation of the TLS 1.2 and SSL 3.0
      protocols.
    </p>
  </background>
  <description>
    <p>Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in GnuTLS. Please review
      the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
    </p>
  </description>
  <impact type="normal">
    <p>An attacker could perform man-in-the-middle attacks to spoof arbitrary
      SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate
      Certification Authority or to inject an arbitrary amount of chosen
      plaintext into the beginning of the application protocol stream, allowing
      for further exploitation.
    </p>
  </impact>
  <workaround>
    <p>There is no known workaround at this time.</p>
  </workaround>
  <resolution>
    <p>All GnuTLS users should upgrade to the latest version:</p>
    
    <code>
      # emerge --sync
      # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose "&gt;=net-libs/gnutls-2.10.0"
    </code>
    
    <p>NOTE: This is a legacy GLSA. Updates for all affected architectures are
      available since August 6, 2010. It is likely that your system is already
      no longer affected by this issue.
    </p>
  </resolution>
  <references>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-2730">CVE-2009-2730</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-3555">CVE-2009-3555</uri>
  </references>
  <metadata timestamp="Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:38:18 +0000" tag="requester">
    keytoaster
  </metadata>
  <metadata timestamp="Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:33:39 +0000" tag="submitter">
    keytoaster
  </metadata>
</glsa>