mail-filter/spf-engine: new version 2.9.2.

The first new version after the rename, with an ebuild that will make
sense to future readers. Thanks to Alex Efros for pointing out that
this package was renamed and for supplying an updated ebuild.

Reported-by: Alex Efros <powerman-asdf@yandex.ru>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/724526
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>

1 files changed, 79 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mail-filter/spf-engine/spf-engine-2.9.2.ebuild b/mail-filter/spf-engine/spf-engine-2.9.2.ebuild
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..eebe9b13725c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mail-filter/spf-engine/spf-engine-2.9.2.ebuild
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+# Copyright 1999-2020 Gentoo Authors
+# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+
+EAPI=7
+
+PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_6 python3_7 python3_8 )
+
+# The built-in ipaddress module handles the parsing of IP addresses. If
+# python is built without ipv6 support, then ipaddress can't parse ipv6
+# addresses, and the daemon will crash if it sees an ipv6 SPF record. In
+# other words, it's completely broken.
+PYTHON_REQ_USE="ipv6"
+
+# setup.py defines entry_points
+DISTUTILS_USE_SETUPTOOLS=rdepend
+inherit distutils-r1
+
+DESCRIPTION="Policy daemon and milter for Postfix SPF verification"
+HOMEPAGE="https://launchpad.net/spf-engine"
+SRC_URI="mirror://pypi/${PN:0:1}/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz"
+
+LICENSE="Apache-2.0"
+SLOT="0"
+KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
+IUSE=""
+
+DEPEND="dev-python/pyspf[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]"
+
+RDEPEND="${DEPEND}
+	dev-python/authres[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]"
+
+DOCS=( CHANGES policyd-spf.conf.commented README README.per_user_whitelisting )
+
+python_prepare_all() {
+	# The "real" config file mentions the commented one, so we point
+	# users in the right direction.
+	local oldconf="policyd-spf.conf.commented"
+	local newconf="/usr/share/doc/${PF}/${oldconf}"
+
+	sed -e "1 s~ ${oldconf}~,\n#  ${newconf}~" -i policyd-spf.conf \
+		|| die 'failed to update commented config file path'
+
+	distutils-r1_python_prepare_all
+}
+
+src_install() {
+	distutils-r1_src_install
+
+	# Remove the milter files that are installed by default. The milter
+	# isn't quite ready:
+	#
+	#   * The README says it's experimental not well-tested.
+	#   * There's no documentation for its configuration parameters
+	#     (expecially the UserID).
+	#   * The configuration file is hard-coded to /usr/local.
+	#   * The paths in the systemd service file are hard-coded to /usr/local.
+	#   * We need to write an OpenRC service script for it.
+	#
+	# These are all eventually doable, but I'm not willing to commit to
+	# making the milter work before upstream is.
+	#
+	rm "${ED}/usr/bin/pyspf-milter" \
+		|| die "failed to remove ${ED}/usr/bin/pyspf-milter"
+	rm -r "${ED}/usr/lib/systemd" \
+		|| die "failed to remove ${ED}/usr/lib/systemd"
+	rm -r "${ED}/usr/etc/init.d" \
+		|| die "failed to remove ${ED}/usr/etc/init.d"
+	einfo "The milter component of spf-engine is still deemed experimental"
+	einfo "and not well-tested by upstream. It's missing configuration"
+	einfo "files, service scripts, and documentation. In other words, it"
+	einfo "doesn't work yet."
+
+	# The setuptools installation routing always works relative to
+	# python's prefix, so that when installing locally you wind up
+	# with paths like /usr/local/etc. However for system installs
+	# that does the wrong thing and puts the sysconfdir at /usr/etc.
+	# Here we move it to the right place.
+	mv -v "${ED}/usr/etc" "${ED}/" || die 'failed to relocate sysconfdir'
+}