diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'sys-apps/systemd/files/242-gcc-9.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | sys-apps/systemd/files/242-gcc-9.patch | 35 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sys-apps/systemd/files/242-gcc-9.patch b/sys-apps/systemd/files/242-gcc-9.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e12d65718238 --- /dev/null +++ b/sys-apps/systemd/files/242-gcc-9.patch @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +From c98b3545008d8e984ab456dcf79787418fcbfe13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> +Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 13:46:55 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] network: remove redunant link name in message + +Fixes #12454. + +gcc was complaining that the link->ifname argument is NULL. Adding +assert(link->ifname) right before the call has no effect. It seems that +gcc is confused by the fact that log_link_warning_errno() internally +calls log_object(), with link->ifname passed as the object. log_object() +is also a macro and is does a check whether the passed object is NULL. +So we have a check if something is NULL right next an unconditional use +of it where it cannot be NULL. I think it's a bug in gcc. + +Anyway, we don't need to use link->ifname here. log_object() already prepends +the object name to the message. +--- + src/network/networkd-link.c | 3 +-- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/src/network/networkd-link.c b/src/network/networkd-link.c +index 533193ac932..6fc82940033 100644 +--- a/src/network/networkd-link.c ++++ b/src/network/networkd-link.c +@@ -338,8 +338,7 @@ static int link_enable_ipv6(Link *link) { + + r = sysctl_write_ip_property_boolean(AF_INET6, link->ifname, "disable_ipv6", disabled); + if (r < 0) +- log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Cannot %s IPv6 for interface %s: %m", +- enable_disable(!disabled), link->ifname); ++ log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Cannot %s IPv6: %m", enable_disable(!disabled)); + else + log_link_info(link, "IPv6 successfully %sd", enable_disable(!disabled)); + |