1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
|
diff -ur gwave-code-249-trunk.orig/src/scwm_guile.c gwave-code-249-trunk/src/scwm_guile.c
--- gwave-code-249-trunk.orig/src/scwm_guile.c 2016-08-12 16:55:04.598733712 -0600
+++ gwave-code-249-trunk/src/scwm_guile.c 2016-08-12 16:55:43.508392247 -0600
@@ -328,41 +328,6 @@
SCM port = scm_current_error_port();
#endif
- /* GJB:FIXME:MS: is this a guile compatibility test that can be dropped
- now? */
- if (scm_ilength (throw_args) >= 3)
- {
- SCM fl;
- fl = SCM_VARIABLE_REF (scm_the_last_stack_fluid_var);
-
- /* GJB:FIXME:MS: This is a horrible hack,
- but DEREF_LAST_STACK macro was throwing a wrong type
- argument at weird times, and I'm trying to avoid
- a crash when I demo to RMS tomorrow, hence this
- ugly hack --04/27/99 gjb */
- if (SCM_NIMP (fl) && SCM_FLUIDP (fl)) {
- SCM stack = DEREF_LAST_STACK;
- SCM subr = SCM_CAR (throw_args);
- SCM message = SCM_CADR (throw_args);
- SCM args = SCM_CADDR (throw_args);
-
- scm_newline(port);
- scm_display_backtrace (stack, port, SCM_UNDEFINED, SCM_UNDEFINED);
- scm_newline(port);
- scm_display_error (stack, port, subr, message, args, SCM_EOL);
- } else {
-/* scwm_msg(ERR,"scwm_handle_error","scm_the_last_stack_fluid not holding a fluid!"); */
- }
- }
- else
- {
- scm_puts ("uncaught throw to ", port);
- scm_prin1 (tag, port, 0);
- scm_puts (": ", port);
- scm_prin1 (throw_args, port, 1);
- scm_putc ('\n', port);
- exit (2);
- }
/* GJB:FIXME:MS: can the scheme code display a backtrace without the
stack argument? */
return scwm_run_hook_message_only(error_hook, scm_cons(tag, throw_args));
|
GitWeb
