diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | decisions/decisions.but | 12 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | decisions/decisions.tex | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | decisions/summary-20110308.tex | 50 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | decisions/summary-20110408.tex | 72 |
4 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/decisions.but b/decisions/decisions.but index c3f092d..1f226fc 100644 --- a/decisions/decisions.but +++ b/decisions/decisions.but @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ Native Portage Multilib Support a standard way to install includes (doinclude/doheader) 229521 [Future EAPI] Add support for multi slot dependencies +234706 +Slacker arches +234711 +GLEP 54: scm package version suffix +237381 +Document appeals process 263565 [Future EAPI] newins et al. should accept "-" for standard input 273101 @@ -24,6 +30,12 @@ Support for license groups in ebuilds [Future EAPI]: BDEPEND (HDEPEND) for classifying build time dependencies as CBUILD or CHOST ones 322049 use_with 3 arg specification differs in portage for $3='' +331987 +Merge -council and -project mailing lists +341959 +council changed the waiting period in "eclass removal policy" +344479 +Slacker point for ferringb 354219 [Future EAPI] Zero-or-one-of operator for REQUIRED_USE 363005 diff --git a/decisions/decisions.tex b/decisions/decisions.tex index c796522..63517fd 100644 --- a/decisions/decisions.tex +++ b/decisions/decisions.tex @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ ferringb, halyc0n (until 12/2010), jmbsvicetto, scarabeus, wired \include{summary-20110111} \include{summary-20110201} +\include{summary-20110308} +\include{summary-20110408} \chapter{Meeting summaries 2011/12} diff --git a/decisions/summary-20110308.tex b/decisions/summary-20110308.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aec0b2a --- /dev/null +++ b/decisions/summary-20110308.tex @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + +\summary{2011}{3}{8} + + +\agendaitem{Preferring latest EAPI in ebuilds} +\index{EAPI!usage in ebuilds}\index{devmanual} + +This change should encourage developers to migrate their ebuilds to latest EAPI +version rather than sticking to old EAPIs. +\vote{Devmanual EAPI section will be updated so the new text reads: +"When writing new ebuilds developers can choose whathever EAPI they think is the +best. Using the features of the latest EAPI is encouraged."}{Accepted by 6 +votes} + + +\agendaitem{Slacking arches} +\index{arches!slacking} + +The ongoing discussion with arch teams has already provided some good feedback. +As we now have a better knowledge of the issues affecting arch teams, some of +the points raised will be moved to the -project ml to expose them to a wider +audience and to try to find solutions from the community. +Common issues identified so far are developer burnout and lack of hardware. +Jorge (jmbsvicetto) is now coordinating between foundation /infra /arch teams +to see if we can define some hardware specs and get the required resources. + + +\agendaitem{GLEP 48 (QA)} +\index{project!qa}\index{project!devrel} + +After a long discussion and a review of the final proposal text, the result is +the following: 4 in favor, 3 didn't state (abstain) + +Given the result, the \glep{48} update is accepted and can proceed, albeit +Peteri raised a question how Devrel is going to work out the resolution after +the process is handled over from QA. It was agreed that the part of the text +(last sentence of the diff) will be updated with string based on what those two +teams agree with without more council involvment (unless required otherwise). + + +\agendaitem{Open bugs with council involvement} + +\bug{344479}: Brian (ferringb) is going to look to it and resolve it (given the +fact the bug is about him so he should do it :)) + + +\agendaitem{Open floor} +\index{icecream} + +They were really really quiet. Nobody wanted icecream. diff --git a/decisions/summary-20110408.tex b/decisions/summary-20110408.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..40d4954 --- /dev/null +++ b/decisions/summary-20110408.tex @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + +\summary{2011}{4}{8} + + +\agendaitem{Project Canterbury, Gentoo's restructure} +\index{Project Canterbury} + +These two topics were added for April's Fool day. There was enough said about +them, so we'll leave them for next year. + + +\agendaitem{Council web app} +\index{council web app}\index{GSOC} + +Petteri asked for this topic to be added to the meeting right before it start as +a student submitted an application for GSoC for doing a council application +(dead link). As Petteri presented it, the application would provide at least +the following 3 features: 1) doodle like feature or doodle integration for +setting times 2) irc bot for automatic log handling (integrate with some +existing software) 3) handling agendas. Other members noted that if it could +also deal with voting, that would be great. There was some discussion about +technical details but the council decided to focus on whether the project was +desired and leave the discussion about details for later. The council members +didn't object to the idea and are open to see what will come out of that +project. Petteri will mentor the student for the project and Brian will watch +over it. + + +\agendaitem{progress on the slacking arches topic} +\index{arches!slacking}\index{arches!manpower}\index{automated testing} +\index{statistics}\index{arches!resources} + +Jorge explained to the other council members that he had planned to start a new +round of emails at the start of the week, but work got in the way. He informed +the other members that he will send 3 or 4 emails during this weekend about +"hiring people" (to address the lack of people), "automated testing", +"statistics" and a revised email about "arch resources". Alex volunteered to +send the email about "automated testing" and manifested his interest to +participate in this discussion. + + +\agendaitem{Open bugs with council involvement} +\index{GLEP!54} + +\begin{itemize} + \item + \bug{234706}: The council agreed on adding a note that it's working on this +issue + \item + \bug{234711}: + The council agreed on adding a note that it has decided to use "live" as +the suffix instead of "scm" if this GLEP ever goes forward and to leave the bug +open. + \item + \bug{237381}: + Jorge promised to finally take care of this bug. + \item + \bug{237381}, \bug{331987}: + Both bugs are on infra side so there's nothing for the council to do about them + \item + \bug{341959}: + Tomas noted that devmanual needs some updates and Alex volunteered to take care of this bug. + \item + \bug{344479}: + Jorge will take care of this bug. +\end{itemize} + + + +\agendaitem{Open floor - listen to the community} + +No issue was brought forward to the council. |