diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'decisions/summary-20100726.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | decisions/summary-20100726.tex | 66 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20100726.tex b/decisions/summary-20100726.tex index 155d978..e51cd39 100644 --- a/decisions/summary-20100726.tex +++ b/decisions/summary-20100726.tex @@ -1,90 +1,80 @@ \summary{2010}{7}{26} +Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-council}{33a301b55a124441d4a2b02055287b47} -\agendaitem{add --as-needed to default profile's LDFLAGS} +Agenda announcement: \agoref{gentoo-council}{620cb09e78b4e7d9997c45eb204f7fd7} + +\agendaitem{Adding --as-needed to the default profile LDFLAGS} \index{as-needed}\index{--as-needed}\index{LDFLAGS} -passed by unanimous vote; - scarabeus will create a news item, - ssuominen already pushed the actual change :D +A motion to add --as-needed to the default profile LDFLAGS was passed by +unanimous vote. \dev{scarabeus} will create a news item, \dev{ssuominen} already pushed the actual change. \agendaitem{REQUIRED_USE} -\index{REQUIRED_USE} +\index{REQUIRED_USE}\index{EAPI!4} -Reference: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html (dead link) +Reference: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html (dead link, see +\ref{2010-05-feringb-requireduse} for the text) -Accepted by all members +REQUIRED_USE was approved provisionally for EAPI 4 by all council members. -\agendaitem{Review eclass removal policy} +\agendaitem{Eclass removal policy} \index{eclasses!removal} -Should it be 2 years since portage 2.1.4.4 went stable? - -$\longrightarrow$ all members agreed on removing the 2 -year policy +Should an eclass still have to remain for 2 years in the tree after the last consumer was removed? Portage 2.1.4.4 went stable in the meantime, which saves the environment of an ebuild and thus also the eclass code. -$\longrightarrow$ QA will write a devmanual patch with a -30+ minimum lastrite period for eclass removals +All members agreed on removing the 2 year policy. QA will write a devmanual patch with a 30+ days minimum lastrite period for eclass removals \agendaitem{Should there a policy about eclass API changes?} \index{eclasses!api changes} -$\longrightarrow$ we didn't reach a decision here, talk will -continue in the mailing lists +No decision was reached; discussions will continue on the mailing lists \agendaitem{Use of invalid DEPEND atom "EAPI_TOO_OLD" instead of calling die in global scope on eclasses} -\index{EAPI_TOO_OLD}\index{die!in global scope}\index{PMS} +\index{EAPI_TOO_OLD}\index{die!in global scope}\index{PMS}\index{eclasses} Reference: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{dee3aab5e8c840ed3fa4add9c7d74b97} and replies -The council opted for calling die -instead of using the invalid DEPEND and required -a patch to devmanual and PMS (ferring will do the devmanual patch) +The council voted for calling die in global scope, instead of using an invalid DEPEND. \dev{ferrinb} will prepare a patch for the devmanual; PMS will also be adapted. -\agendaitem{Mailing lists} +\agendaitem{Mailing list for the council agenda} \index{mailing list!gentoo-council} \index{mailing list!gentoo-dev} \index{mailing list!gentoo-project} \index{council!meeting!agenda} -Should we post council agenda to -council? -dev? -project? - -Some devs suggest we should cross-post to -dev and -council -but not everyone likes cross-posting as it can lead to fragmentation. -Petteri suggested punting -council and using -project instead +Should the council agenda be posted to the -council mailing list, to -dev, or to +-project? -$\longrightarrow$ there was a vote on punting -council -that ended in a 2-2 tie (ferringb had left) -jmbsvicetto and wired voted against, betelgeuse and scarabeus voted in favor +Some developers suggested we should cross-post to -dev and -council, but not everyone likes cross-posting as it can lead to fragmentation. \dev{betelgeuse} suggested punting -council and using -project instead. +A motion to punt -council ended in a 2-2 tie. The discussion will be continued on the mailing lists. -$\longrightarrow$ discussion will be continued in the -mailing lists \agendaitem{Bugs assigned to council@g.o} \begin{itemize} \item - \bug{234706}: ask Halcy0n if he wants to resume work on this -bug + \bug{234706}: \dev{halcy0n} will be asked if he wants to resume work on this + bug. \item - \bug{256451}: ask ferringb if he still wants to do it + \bug{256451}: \dev{ferringb} will be asked if he still wants to do this. \item - \bug{256453}: wired will take care of this + \bug{256453}: \dev{wired} will take care of this. \item - \bug{237381}: jmbsvicetto will take care of this + \bug{237381}: \dev{jmbsvicetto} will take care of this. \end{itemize} -\agendaitem{Open floor: listen to developers} +\agendaitem{Open floor} -$\longrightarrow$ no input... +No items were brought up. |