Improve up to 3/2009

1 files changed, 37 insertions, 38 deletions

diff --git a/decisions/summary-20090226.tex b/decisions/summary-20090226.tex
index a7693e5..bf6c034 100644
--- a/decisions/summary-20090226.tex
+++ b/decisions/summary-20090226.tex
@@ -1,60 +1,59 @@
 
 \summary{2009}{2}{26}
 
+Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{6ca56e28c0a22b09ebe076ac57defcfd}
 
-\agendaitem{Open Council Spot}
+Agenda announcement: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{b3ae2dcfe00504d0d5f8ce9abb196176}
+
+
+\agendaitem{Vacant council seat}
 \index{council!members}
 
-Should leio fill the empty council spot?
+Should \dev{leio} fill the vacant council seat?
 
-        Since Mark(halcy0n) resigned from the council there is an empty spot.
-        Since Mart Raudsepp(leio) is ranked next from the last election, he is
-        eligible to fill the spot.
+Since \dev{halcy0n} resigned from the council there is a vacant seat. Since 
+\dev{leio} is ranked next from the last election, he is eligible to fill the 
+seat.
 
-        Conclusion:
-            Mart Raudsepp is unanimously approved for the council.
+Conclusion: \dev{leio} is unanimously approved for the council.
 
 
 \agendaitem{GLEP 55}
-\index{GLEP!55}
 
-        There had been quite a bit of discussion on this topic recently.
-        Within hours of the council meeting new proposals were being proposed
-        and discussion was ongoing. 
+There had been quite a bit of discussion on the topic of \glep{55} recently.
+Within hours of the council meeting new proposals were being proposed and 
+discussion was ongoing. Also during the council meeting a lengthy discussion 
+resulted.
+
+Conclusion: No decision as of yet. \dev{ciaranm} and \dev{zmedico} volunteered 
+to benchmark the various proposals on the package managers they maintain 
+(paludis and portage, respectively). \dev{betelgeuse} will assist with the 
+portage benchmarks. \dev{dev-zero} and \dev{antarus} will write up a comparison 
+of the various proposals and their various advantages and disadvantages within a 
+week.
 
-        Conclusion:
-            No decision as of yet. Ciaran Mccreesh(ciaranm) and Zac
-            Medico(zmedico) volunteered to benchmark the various proposals on
-            the package managers they maintain(paludis and portage
-            respectively. Petteri(Betelgeuse) will assist with the portage
-	    benchmarks. Tiziano(dev-zero) and Alec Warner(antarus) will write
-            up a comparison of the various proposals and their various
-            advantages and disadvantages within a week.
 
 \agendaitem{GLEP 54}
-\index{GLEP!54}
 
-        There had been some discussion on gentoo-dev since last meeting,
-        though no consensus or agreement had been reached(surprise!)
+There had been some discussion regarding \glep{54} on gentoo-dev since the last 
+meeting, though no consensus or agreement had been reached (surprise!).
 
-        Conclusion:
-            Thomas Anderson(tanderson) and Luca Barbato(lu_zero) will write up
-            a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two
-            proposals(-scm and _live). This will be completed within a week.
+Conclusion: \dev{tanderson} and \dev{lu_zero} will write up a comparison of the 
+advantages and disadvantages of the two proposals (-scm and _live). This will 
+be completed within a week.
 
             
 \agendaitem{Overlay Masking in Repositories}
 \index{package.unmask}\index{overlays}
 
-        Brian Harring(ferringb) asked for discussion for when overlays
-        attempted to unmask packages provided by the master 
-        repository(gentoo-x86). Because this is only available in portage
-        (it is contrary to PMS), Brian thought it should not be allowed.
-        
-        Numerous suggestions were made to the effect that if a standardized
-        set format was agreed upon for repositories and package.unmask was
-        allowed to contain sets, then this problem would be fixed.
-
-        Conclusion:
-            No decision, as only discussion was requested. Mart Raudsepp(leio)
-	    will follow up on this with discussion on gentoo-dev
+\dev{ferringb} asked for discussion for when overlays attempt to unmask 
+packages provided by the master repository (gentoo-x86). Because this is only 
+available in portage (it is contrary to PMS), Brian thought it should not be 
+allowed.
+
+Numerous suggestions were made to the effect that if a standardized set format 
+was agreed upon for repositories and package.unmask was allowed to contain 
+sets, then this problem would be fixed.
+
+Conclusion: No decision, as only discussion was requested. \dev{leio} will 
+follow up on this with discussion on gentoo-dev.