decisions/summary-20081113.tex


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

\summary{2008}{11}{13}


\agendaitem{Open Bugs}

\begin{itemize}
 \item 
 \bug{234706}:
        Mark sent a proposal to gentoo-dev about this. No other discussion or
	decision.
 \item
 \bug{234713}:
        Conclusion:
            This bug has been RESO LATER'ed pending concrete need and
            consensus(GLEP 54 being the main one).
 \item
 \bug{185572}:
        Conclusion:
            Jorge(jmbsvicetto) will talk to other members of devrel about this
            bug.
 \item
 \bug{234716}:
        Conclusion:
            Userrel is responsible for establishing these policies. Since each
            developer is also a user at some point, these policies will apply
            to developers as well as users.
 \item
 \bug{234711}:
        Conclusion:
            No decision. David Leverton commented that portage's current
            method for identifying 'live' ebuilds was hackish, as it depends
            on the list of inherited eclasses, which could change. Also, it
	    was pointed out that some ebuilds use scm eclasses to check out
	    specific revisions(mythtv). PROPERTIES=live was considered
            as another option.
\end{itemize}