blob: 4a9f6358e17f9d2a652fc4d4a444c43ab74cb53d (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
\summary{2008}{11}{13}
Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{0992f724afbad5523541fa53e68d5ac4}
Agenda announcement: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{1e4e1ef37530f9201c195afdc3297602}
\agendaitem{Open Bugs}
\begin{itemize}
\item
\bug{234706}: \dev{halcy0n} sent a proposal to gentoo-dev about this, see the
\agoref{gentoo-dev}{480798ea76d5ad23b66e5e51e700f0e6}. No further discussion or
decision took place.
\item
\bug{234713}: This bug about \glep{55} has been marked RESOLVED LATER pending
concrete need for any action and a consensus (\glep{54} being the main driving
force behind it).
\item
\bug{185572}: This bug is waiting for action from devrel. \dev{jmbsvicetto}
will talk to the other project members about it. \index{project!devrel}
\item
\bug{234716}: Userrel is responsible for establishing these policies. Since each
developer is also a user at some point, these policies will apply to developers
as well as users. \index{project!userrel} However, it was also stated during
the meeting that enthusiasm for approaching the topic was running quite low.
\item
\bug{234711}: No decision was taken. David Leverton commented that portage's
current method for identifying 'live' ebuilds was hackish, as it depends on the
list of inherited eclasses, which could change. Also, it was pointed out that
some ebuilds use scm eclasses to check out specific revisions(mythtv).
PROPERTIES=live was considered as another option. \dev{lu_zero} agreed to update
his alternate proposal and document the portage status.
\end{itemize}
|
GitWeb
