blob: 7721b80264170b623cd7097b46a27aef80b71f1f (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
|
\summary{2010}{8}{23}
Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-project}{2b7d7ab0ac214fd92041459a5775e5de}
Agenda announcement: \agoref{gentoo-project}{7bbd75ed74f16ea868d780ce725bd627}
\agendaitem{EAPI 4 status}
\index{EAPI!4}
The \package{dev-lang/portage} EAPI 4 tracker is \bug{273620}. There are three
open blockers left: \bug{273642}, \bug{273625}, and \bug{273633}. Repoman is
not updated yet, and support for EAPI 4_pre1 has not been enabled yet.
\agendaitem{GLEP 54}
\index{GLEP!54!approval}
References:
\begin{itemize}
\item
\glep{54}
\item
\agoref{gentoo-council}{2677e155e8c903e6cc9857021c12bb31}
\item
\agoref{gentoo-dev}{84f6893fb1dc1265367aa7ba19769244}
\end{itemize}
The discussion on \glep{54} was restarted once more, with a discussion on the
precise version format.
\vote{Approve \glep{54}.}{Motion passed, 4 yes, 2 no.}
\agendaitem{GLEP 55}
\index{GLEP!55!rejection}
\vote{Approve \glep{55}.}{Motion not passed; 2 yes, 4 no.}
\vote{Do we want to find a solution for the issues raised by
\glep{55}?}{Motion passed; 5 yes, 1 no.}
We should focus on finding an acceptable implemention or just vote on all the
proposed ones.
\agendaitem{Bugs assigned to council@g.o}
\begin{itemize}
\item
\bug{234706}: No new developments.
\item
\bug{256451}: All done.
\item
\bug{256453}: All done.
\end{itemize}
\agendaitem{Open floor}
\index{espresso machine}
\dev{antarus} wants an espresso machine.
|
GitWeb
