blob: 6d21aeda13b6f5c0bb31fc613a50897efa405e47 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Roll call
=========
(here, proxy [by whom] or slacker?)
amne here
betelgeuse here
dberkholz slacker [39 minutes late]
flameeyes here
lu_zero here
vapier here
jokey here
Updates to last month's topics
==============================
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20080214-summary.txt
Document of being an active developer
-------------------------------------
No updates
Slacker arches
--------------
2 months ago:
vapier will work on rich0's suggestion and repost it for
discussion on -dev ML
Updates:
vapier said he was going to work on it this weekend.
GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml
--------------------------------------------
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0046.html
Last month:
Caveat on approval about allowed protocols
Updates:
No updates; no authors present
EAPI=0
------
Last month:
Halcy0n was working on it
Updates:
Ciaran has been contributing and has committed quite a few
things. Halcy0n hopes to work on it in the next couple of weeks.
He informed us that Ciaran said when he finishes the environment
tables, EAPI=0 is probably a week of solid work from having a
draft for review.
Halcy0n wasn't around when the topic came up, so the above info
was from after the meeting.
New topics
==========
Summer of Code
--------------
Should Gentoo devs be allowed to participate?
GNOME's policy is that they favor people who haven't contributed
before, but they will accept great projects from contributors.
Decision: Council members will become additional SoC admins, and
will serve as tiebreaker votes if they aren't actively participating
in SoC project selection.
Decision: Gentoo SoC admins will decide whether non-contributors
should be favored over contributors.
Package maintainers
-------------------
Proposed by killerx (anant)
Decision: We'll promote proxy-maintainers more -- GMN, website, etc.
amd64 arch team and big bug list
--------------------------------
Proposed by armin76 (raul)
kingtaco (mike) said it's hard to keep people interested in
keywording.
Anyone interested has had permission to keyword and stabilize
non-system packages since 2007.1 (see -core email from kingtaco with
subject "AMD64 keywording").
Open floor
----------
A list of required attendees would be useful. dberkholz will start
creating the agenda along with this list in advance of the meeting.
Posting the agenda on a google calendar, along with other stuff,
could help. flameeyes is starting to work with the PR team on this.
|
GitWeb