blob: 5077de821be0a3144141589ad09b232dab7855f2 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Summary of Gentoo council meeting 9 Septemper 2018
Agenda
======
1. Roll call
2. Proposal to accept GLEP 76 "Copyright Policy"
3. Open bugs with council involvement
- bug #637328: GLEP 14 needs to be updated
- bug #642072: Joint venture to deal with copyright issues
- bug #663466: Please review the latest Code of Conduct changes
4. Open floor
Roll call
=========
7 attendees: dilfridge, k_f, leio, slyfox, ulm, whissi, williamh
Proposal to accept GLEP 76 "Copyright Policy"
=============================================
Main changes are:
- Copyright line will change from "Gentoo Foundation" to
"Gentoo Authors" (or explicit list of authors).
- All commits will be required to have a Signed-off-by line certifying
their origin, and that they're free software (or a license file)
Clarifying notes:
- ::gentoo repository should use generic "Gentoo Authors" as authorship
is complicated (many committers).
- 'Signed-off-by' tags on commit messages is both the authors and
committers tracker.
- No sudden change to ::gentoo repository will happen. Copyright update will
happen gradually.
- Fully autogenerated files can use CC0 or CC-PDM license without
a copyright header.
- licenses/ directory changes are to be covered by Gentoo's DCO.
- Pseudonymous / anonymous contributions would have to be proxied to
::gentoo by a committer with real name.
Votes: 7 yes.
Passed council, now waiting on trustees vote.
References:
https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0076.html
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/733d402088fe09685660363450a04692
Open bugs with council involvement
==================================
- bug #637328: GLEP 14 needs to be updated.
Update by security@ team:
"""Its progressing, we have an almost final version circulating
internally. Hopefully next [security team] meeting we will vote."""
- bug #642072: Joint venture to deal with copyright issues
Progressing. GLEP 76 "Copyright Policy" was accepted by council@.
- bug #663466: Please review the latest Code of Conduct changes
Tl;DR: add proctors@ to escalation path for Code of Conduct
violations as mediators before escalation to comrel@.
Motion: approve changes of https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project:Council/Code_of_conduct&diff=727730&oldid=723544
and https://bugs.gentoo.org/663466#c6 to code of conduct.
Clarifying notes:
- Both diffs of a document in a single place:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=User%3ADilfridge%2FCoC&type=revision&diff=732428&oldid=633448
- More on proctors@ scope: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proctors
Votes: 2 no, 4 yes, 1 abstain.
Passed.
References:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council#Open_bugs_with_Council_participation
https://bugs.gentoo.org/637328
https://bugs.gentoo.org/642072
https://bugs.gentoo.org/663466
https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project:Council/Code_of_conduct&diff=727730&oldid=723544
https://bugs.gentoo.org/663466#c6
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proctors
https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=User%3ADilfridge%2FCoC&type=revision&diff=732428&oldid=633448
Open floor
==========
- Discussion of motion pass criteria
Would "2 no/3 yes/2 abstain" pass or we need majority?
https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0039.html states:
""" Council decisions are by majority vote of those who show up (or
their proxies)."""
There are a few interpretations:
1. majority of members present:
3 < 4 and motion is not passed
2. simple majority
motion is passed (3 > 2)
Gentoo used [2.]: majority of members to cast the vote. To be clarified.
|
GitWeb