summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: b8a4abdd2af7ebf8bc892ee025b2dd4275ea9251 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
<@ulm> meeting time                                                     [21:00]
<@ulm> agenda:
       https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev-announce/message/1fc299e7662ee2e30cfb1813c13cd7ca
<@ulm> !proj council
<+willikins> (council@gentoo.org) dilfridge, gyakovlev, mattst88, slyfox, ulm,
             whissi, williamh
<@ulm> roll call
* slyfox here
* gyakovlev here
* Whissi here
* WilliamH here
<@ulm> dilfridge? mattst88?                                             [21:02]
* dilfridge here
<@mattst88> hello!                                                      [21:03]
* ulm here
<@slyfox> \o/                                                           [21:04]
<@mattst88> sorry, cat took over my lap :)
<@ulm> so, let's start
<@slyfox> pic or didn't happen :)
<@ulm> Open bugs with Council participation
<@ulm> bug 662982
<+willikins> ulm: https://bugs.gentoo.org/662982 "[TRACKER] New default
             locations for the Gentoo repository, distfiles, and binary
             packages"; Gentoo Linux, Current packages; CONF;
             zmedico:dev-portage
<@ulm> that's still waiting for its blocker bug 574752
<+willikins> ulm: https://bugs.gentoo.org/574752 "Rename portage-YYYYMMDD.tar*
             snapshots with gentoo-YYYYMMDD.tar*"; Gentoo Infrastructure,
             Other; IN_P; mgorny:infra-bugs
<@ulm> which is stalled because of the topdir renaming from "portage" to
       "gentoo-YYYYMMDD"                                                [21:05]
<@Whissi> The files are on mirror... will ping portage team what is required
          to do the switch.
<@ulm> I wonder what would be the issue with naming it gentoo?          [21:06]
<@dilfridge> we could just rename ourselves to "portage linux", that might go
             faster
<@mattst88> lol
<@WilliamH> ulm: I also have wondered why they need the date in the directory
            name.
<@ulm> dilfridge: the problem is that the diffs explode if the topdir name
       changes between snapshots
<@WilliamH> ulm: correct.                                               [21:07]
<@dilfridge> right
<@WilliamH> so the dir name should be constant
<@ulm> my simple minded solution would be _not_ to rename it :)
<@ulm> anyone wants to bring forward a motion? :)                       [21:08]
<@Whissi> No, we already half-way + one step
<@Whissi> We will get to the finish!
<@WilliamH> I motion that the directory name in the snapshots be "gentoo"
            without the date.
<@dilfridge> finnish?
<@dilfridge> WilliamH++
<@ulm> please vote on WilliamH's motion                                 [21:09]
* dilfridge yes
<@Whissi> No. No new vote.
* WilliamH yes
<@Whissi> Why do you want to change anything? Can you explain that first?
<@ulm> Whissi: the top-level dir used to be named "portage" without a date
       extension
<@WilliamH> Whissi: it has been explained. having the date in the directory
            name explodes the diff
<@Whissi> We do --strip-components for that...
<@ulm> Whissi: for creating the diff?                                   [21:10]
<@Whissi> I don't know what you are suddenly talking about.
<veremitz> iirc hasn't robbat2 and zmedico mitigated that issue already?
<@WilliamH> There was no reason given for changing the name of the top level
            directory.
<@Whissi> I am still at gentoo-YYYYMMDD.tar*
<@Whissi> And the last progress was that this file is now available
<@ulm> ok, maybe it's wise to table this until next month and get more
       information                                                      [21:11]
<@Whissi> So at one point we will just switch and no longer provide old
          tarball
<@WilliamH> We keep tabling this.
<@WilliamH> Why can't we just get it done?
<@ulm> voting seems a little too knee-jerk right now
<@Whissi> Maybe because nobody really knows the exact status.
<@WilliamH> If we have to revert back we should to get it done since this is
            such a blocker.                                             [21:12]
<@ulm> but we should ask infra and/or the portage team why they need a date
       extension now
<@WilliamH> ulm: ++
<@Whissi> I can volunteer to get bug updated with current status and what's
          blocking.
<@slyfox> sounds good!
<@ulm> Whissi: please do, thanks                                        [21:13]
<@ulm> so, voting is aborted
<@WilliamH> Ok fwm.
<@ulm> anyone else wants to comment on this?
<@WilliamH> There was no need before for the date in the dir name so I agree
            that needs to be explained.
<@ulm> let's move on                                                    [21:14]
<@ulm> but 688876
<@ulm> bug 688876
<+willikins> ulm: https://bugs.gentoo.org/688876 "Comrel webpage does not
             document expectations of privacy"; Community Relations, Developer
             Relations; CONF; rich0:comrel
<@WilliamH> I guess we are just monitoring that
<@ulm> we're only in cc, I don't see anything actionable for council
<@slyfox> Worth asking the update in the bug.
<@ulm> slyfox: can you do please?
<@slyfox> Will do                                                       [21:15]
<@ulm> k
<@ulm> bug 729062
<+willikins> ulm: https://bugs.gentoo.org/729062 "Services and Software which
             is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in the Gentoo
             namespace"; Gentoo Council, unspecified; IN_P; jstein:council
<@mattst88> yeah, seems reasonable to ask ComRel to respond
<@Whissi> Discussion not yet finished. No motion called yet.
<@WilliamH> I don't think that's actionable either.
<@ulm> yeah, let's wait for the result of the discussion                [21:16]
<@ulm> or for its dying down :/
<@ulm> bug 736760
<+willikins> ulm: https://bugs.gentoo.org/736760 "Application to Software
             Freedom Conservancy"; Gentoo Foundation, Proposals; CONF;
             mgorny:trustees
<@ulm> nothing actionable there either atm
<@WilliamH> Right.
<@gyakovlev> it's in progress
<@gyakovlev> but yeah
<@ulm> so                                                               [21:18]
<@ulm> opemn floor
<@ulm> *open
<@ulm> anyone?
<@mattst88> just as an aside: I've finished up my personal stuff that was
            sucking my time as of Friday, so I'll get the meeting minutes for
            the two months I chaired out today                          [21:19]
<@slyfox> woohooo!
<@ulm> good :)
<@ulm> september is missing too, I guess I'll do it together with this one
                                                                        [21:20]
<@gyakovlev> and I almost got my log out of drives from dead machine. raid
             card arrives today, which will help me get data out.
<@ulm> so, looks like there's nothing else on open floor                [21:21]
<@ulm> meeting is closed then
<@dilfridge> \o/
<@Whissi> \o/
<@Whissi> Thank you for chairing!
<@slyfox> Thanks all!
* gyakovlev goes to sleep
*** ulm (~ulm@gentoo/developer/ulm) has set the topic for #gentoo-council:
    "206th meeting: 2020-11-08 19:00 UTC |
    https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20201108T19 |
    https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council |
    https://dev.gentoo.org/~dilfridge/decisions.html"
<@gyakovlev> thanks
<@ulm> gyakovlev: you'll be chairing next month                         [21:22]
<@gyakovlev> ack
<@ulm> and everyone note end of daylight saving time
* gyakovlev settiing up reminders